Adaptations Physiologiques à l'Exercice et Réadaptation à l'Effort, Faculté des Sciences du Sport, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens Cedex, France.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Jan;91(1):9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.09.014.
Lelard T, Doutrellot P-L, David P, Ahmaidi S. Effects of a 12-week Tai Chi Chuan program versus a balance training program on postural control and walking ability in older people.
To compare the respective effects of 2 balance training programs: a Tai Chi (TC) program and a balance training program on static postural control and walking ability.
Randomized controlled trial.
General community.
Older subjects (N=28) participated in the study.
The TC group (n=14; mean age +/- SD, 76.8+/-5.1y) and the balance training group (n=14; 77.0+/-4.5y) were both trained for 12 weeks.
Static postural control was assessed via measurement of center of pressure sway under eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC) conditions. Walking speed over a 10-meter course was also assessed.
After the 12-week training period, there were no significant differences in walking speed or postural parameters in either the EO or EC conditions for the TC and balance training groups. Performance in the EC condition was lower than in the EO condition in pretest and posttest for the balance training and TC groups. The Romberg quotient (EO/EC ratio) was significantly higher after the balance training program than the TC program (P<.05).
We cannot conclude that the balance training program has better effects than the TC program on postural control or walking ability. None of the outcome measures showed significant change posttraining in either the TC or the balance training groups. However, the differences described in the Romberg quotient after the training period between the TC and the balance training groups suggest that TC should be helpful to limit the deleterious effects of eye closure on postural balance.
Lelard T、Doutrellot P-L、David P、Ahmaidi S。12 周太极拳课程与平衡训练课程对老年人姿势控制和行走能力的影响。
比较两种平衡训练方案(太极拳[TC]和平衡训练)对静态姿势控制和行走能力的各自影响。
随机对照试验。
一般社区。
老年受试者(N=28)参加了这项研究。
TC 组(n=14;平均年龄 +/- SD,76.8+/-5.1y)和平衡训练组(n=14;77.0+/-4.5y)均接受 12 周训练。
静态姿势控制通过睁眼(EO)和闭眼(EC)条件下的压力中心摆动测量来评估。还评估了 10 米课程的行走速度。
经过 12 周的训练期,TC 和平衡训练组在 EO 和 EC 条件下的行走速度或姿势参数均无显著差异。平衡训练和 TC 组在预测试和后测试中,EC 条件下的表现均低于 EO 条件。平衡训练计划后的 Romberg 商(EO/EC 比)明显高于 TC 计划(P<.05)。
我们不能得出平衡训练计划对姿势控制或行走能力的影响优于 TC 计划的结论。TC 或平衡训练组在训练后,没有任何结果测量指标显示出明显变化。然而,在训练期间,TC 和平衡训练组之间 Romberg 商的差异表明,TC 有助于限制闭眼对姿势平衡的不利影响。