Suppr超能文献

谁参与了?在 MIDUS 国家健康与幸福感研究中对纵向保留率的核算。

Who participates? Accounting for longitudinal retention in the MIDUS national study of health and well-being.

机构信息

Medical Science Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

出版信息

J Aging Health. 2010 Apr;22(3):307-31. doi: 10.1177/0898264309358617. Epub 2010 Jan 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This article uses data from MIDUS (Midlife in the United States), a national study of Americans (N = 7,108), to investigate factors that predict longitudinal retention. With its extensive age range (25-75 at Time 1) and long-term design (9- to 10-year survey interval), MIDUS is useful for investigating common sociodemographic and health predictors of continuing participation.

METHOD

The authors conducted logistic regression analyses of baseline sociodemographic and health variables predicting retention. Select interaction terms examined the interplay between targeted variables.

RESULTS

Consistent with prior research, higher retention rates were found among Whites, females, and married individuals as well as those with better health and more education. Interaction analyses further clarified that (a) health status better predicted retention among older compared to younger respondents and among women compared to men, (b) marital status better predicted retention among Whites compared to non-Whites and among women compared to men, and (c) economic status better predicted retention among those with poorer functional health status.

DISCUSSION

The authors' analyses clarify that longitudinal retention varied depending on respondents' sociodemographic characteristics and their health status. The unique contribution of this article is that factors predicting nonparticipation can be offset by, or compensated for, other factors.

摘要

目的

本文利用美国中期生活研究(MIDUS)的数据(N=7108),调查了预测纵向保留率的因素。MIDUS 的年龄范围广泛(在第 1 次调查时为 25-75 岁)且设计长期(调查间隔为 9-10 年),因此非常适合调查常见的社会人口学和健康预测因素对持续参与的影响。

方法

作者对基线社会人口学和健康变量进行了逻辑回归分析,以预测保留率。选择的交互项检验了目标变量之间的相互作用。

结果

与先前的研究一致,发现白人、女性和已婚人士以及健康状况较好和受教育程度较高的人保留率较高。交互分析进一步阐明:(a)与年轻受访者相比,健康状况更好地预测了年长受访者的保留率,与男性相比,健康状况更好地预测了女性受访者的保留率;(b)与非白人相比,婚姻状况更好地预测了白人受访者的保留率,与男性相比,婚姻状况更好地预测了女性受访者的保留率;(c)与健康状况较差的人相比,经济状况更好地预测了健康功能较差的人的保留率。

讨论

作者的分析表明,纵向保留率因受访者的社会人口学特征及其健康状况而异。本文的独特贡献在于,非参与的预测因素可以被其他因素抵消或补偿。

相似文献

1
Who participates? Accounting for longitudinal retention in the MIDUS national study of health and well-being.
J Aging Health. 2010 Apr;22(3):307-31. doi: 10.1177/0898264309358617. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
4
Who Returns? Understanding Varieties of Longitudinal Participation in MIDUS.
J Aging Health. 2021 Dec;33(10):896-907. doi: 10.1177/08982643211018552. Epub 2021 May 17.
5
Marital history, health and mortality among older men and women in England and Wales.
BMC Public Health. 2010 Sep 15;10:554. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-554.
7
Marital status, marital quality, and heart rate variability in the MIDUS cohort.
J Fam Psychol. 2015 Apr;29(2):290-5. doi: 10.1037/fam0000068.
8
Predictors of five-year mortality in older Canadians: the Canadian Study of Health and Aging.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 Oct;47(10):1249-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb05207.x.
9
Bioindicators in the MIDUS national study: protocol, measures, sample, and comparative context.
J Aging Health. 2010 Dec;22(8):1059-80. doi: 10.1177/0898264310374355. Epub 2010 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Patterns of Perceived Control That Buffer Against Cognitive Decline in Midlife and Old Age.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2025 Jun 10;80(7). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaf081.
3
Educational disparities in 20-year trajectories of psychological well-being in a national sample.
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 3;15(1):11437. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95058-y.
4
Contacts with health services for COVID-19-related reasons during the first wave of the pandemic in Portugal: a longitudinal study.
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Aug 16;2(2):e000979. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-000979. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Association between chronic pain and attrition: a prospective analysis of a national sample of midlife adults in the USA, 2004-2014.
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Mar 22;2(1):e000564. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000564. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Development of a machine learning-based multivariable prediction model for the naturalistic course of generalized anxiety disorder.
J Anxiety Disord. 2025 Mar;110:102978. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2025.102978. Epub 2025 Jan 25.
9
Characterizing Cognitive Dispersion and Its Correlates Across the Adult Lifespan in MIDUS.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2025 May 8;80(6). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae201.
10
Coping Styles as Mediators Between Purpose in Life and Cognitive Function: A Longitudinal Study.
Res Aging. 2025 Mar-Apr;47(3-4):240-252. doi: 10.1177/01640275241312195. Epub 2025 Jan 5.

本文引用的文献

2
25-year trends and socio-demographic differences in response rates: Finnish adult health behaviour survey.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21(6):409-15. doi: 10.1007/s10654-006-9019-8. Epub 2006 Jun 28.
3
Physiological reactivity to cognitive stressors: variations by age and socioeconomic status.
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2006;62(3):221-35. doi: 10.2190/17DU-21AA-5HUK-7UFG.
4
Do daily stress processes account for socioeconomic health disparities?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2005 Oct;60 Spec No 2:34-9. doi: 10.1093/geronb/60.special_issue_2.s34.
5
Social environments and the genetics of aging: advancing knowledge of protective health mechanisms.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2005 Mar;60 Spec No 1:12-23. doi: 10.1093/geronb/60.special_issue_1.12.
6
Relationship between subjective social status and measures of health in older Taiwanese persons.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Mar;53(3):483-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53169.x.
7
Estimating non-response bias in family studies: application to mental health and lifestyle.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19(7):623-30. doi: 10.1023/b:ejep.0000036814.56108.66.
8
Socioeconomic status and health: a micro-level analysis of exposure and vulnerability to daily stressors.
J Health Soc Behav. 2004 Mar;45(1):1-16. doi: 10.1177/002214650404500101.
10
Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation: description and an illustration.
Public Opin Q. 2000 Fall;64(3):299-308. doi: 10.1086/317990.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验