• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估结肠镜筛查的年龄:质量保证评估。

Evaluating screening age for colonoscopy: a quality assurance assessment.

机构信息

Corporate Risk Management, AMSURG, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug;44(7):e147-53. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181cadce5.

DOI:10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181cadce5
PMID:20104186
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate colonoscopies in patients aged 40 to 49 and 50 to 59 years from multiple endoscopy surgery centers serving a wide geographical area.

METHODS

An observational prospective multicenter quality assurance review was conducted in 49 Ambulatory Surgery Centers in 17 states with 315 gastroenterologists. Care of patients and routine of gastroenterologists continued as standard practice with patients attending for purposes of screening, surveillance, and symptoms.

RESULTS

There were 1688 and 5090 consecutive qualified patients aged 40 to 49 and 50 to 59 years, respectively, receiving colonoscopies in a designated 4 week period. There was no significant difference (P=0.55) in the screening category between ages 40 to 49 (n=420) and 50 to 59 years (n=2705) in incidence of colon polyps although the older age group had more than 6 times the number of patients than the younger age group. Age group of 40 to 49-year-old males (21.5%) are at similar risk to 40 to 49-year-old females (21.1%) in development of carcinoma and adenoma polyps combined. Age group of 50 to 59-year-old males (31.3%) appear at greater risk (P<0.0001) than age 50 to 59-year-old females (18.4%) in development of carcinoma and adenoma polyps combined in the screening category. For surveillance and symptom categories significant differences (P<0.05) occurred between both age groups 40 to 49 and 50 to 59 years for males but not females in development of carcinoma and adenoma polyps combined.

CONCLUSIONS

The equal risk of colon polyps in screening colonoscopies for age 40 to 49 and 50 to 59 years suggest reexamination of current recommendations for 50 years as the beginning age for screening colonoscopy. Further studies are needed to examine sex differences and cost effectiveness of screening colonoscopies beginning at age 40 years and to explore these factors as well in surveillance and symptom categories.

摘要

目的

评估来自多个内镜外科中心的 40 至 49 岁和 50 至 59 岁患者的结肠镜检查情况。

方法

在 17 个州的 49 个门诊手术中心进行了一项观察性前瞻性多中心质量保证审查,共有 315 名胃肠病学家参与。患者的护理和胃肠病学家的常规治疗仍按照标准实践进行,患者接受结肠镜检查的目的是筛查、监测和症状治疗。

结果

在指定的 4 周内,分别有 1688 名和 5090 名连续合格的 40 至 49 岁和 50 至 59 岁患者接受了结肠镜检查。在筛查类别中,40 至 49 岁(n=420)和 50 至 59 岁(n=2705)年龄组之间的结肠息肉发生率没有显著差异(P=0.55),尽管老年组的患者人数是年轻组的 6 倍多。40 至 49 岁男性(21.5%)发生癌和腺瘤息肉的风险与 40 至 49 岁女性(21.1%)相似。50 至 59 岁男性(31.3%)在筛查类别中发生癌和腺瘤息肉的风险(P<0.0001)明显高于 50 至 59 岁女性(18.4%)。在监测和症状类别中,40 至 49 岁和 50 至 59 岁两个年龄组的男性在癌和腺瘤息肉的发生方面存在显著差异(P<0.05),但女性没有。

结论

40 至 49 岁和 50 至 59 岁年龄组的筛查结肠镜检查中结肠息肉的风险相等,这表明需要重新审查目前 50 岁作为筛查结肠镜检查起始年龄的建议。需要进一步研究以检查 40 岁开始筛查结肠镜检查的性别差异和成本效益,并在监测和症状类别中探讨这些因素。

相似文献

1
Evaluating screening age for colonoscopy: a quality assurance assessment.评估结肠镜筛查的年龄:质量保证评估。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug;44(7):e147-53. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181cadce5.
2
Withdrawal times and associated factors in colonoscopy: a quality assurance multicenter assessment.结肠镜检查的退出时间及其相关因素:一项质量保证多中心评估。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Apr;44(4):e80-6. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181bf9b02.
3
Low risk of colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas more than 10 years after negative colonoscopy.结肠镜检查阴性 10 年后结直肠癌和高级腺瘤的风险较低。
Gastroenterology. 2010 Mar;138(3):870-6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.10.054. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
4
[Results of coloscopy screening in 2005--an Internet-based documentation].2005年结肠镜检查筛查结果——基于互联网的记录
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2006 Feb 24;131(8):379-83. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-932528.
5
Colonoscopy: a review of its yield for cancers and adenomas by indication.结肠镜检查:按适应证对其癌症和腺瘤检出率的综述。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1995 Mar;90(3):353-65.
6
Appropriateness of colonoscopy in the era of colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, multicenter study in a private-practice setting (Berlin Colonoscopy Project 1, BECOP 1).结肠镜检查在结直肠癌筛查时代的适用性:一项在私人诊所环境下进行的前瞻性多中心研究(柏林结肠镜检查项目1,BECOP 1)。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Oct;50(10):1628-38. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9029-y.
7
Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings.根据结直肠远端检查结果评估无症状成年人近端晚期肿瘤的风险。
N Engl J Med. 2000 Jul 20;343(3):169-74. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200007203430302.
8
High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening.高清电子染色结肠镜与高清白光结肠镜用于一般风险结直肠癌筛查的比较。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jun;105(6):1301-7. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.51. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
9
Incidental finding of colorectal cancer in screening colonoscopy and its cost effectiveness.结肠镜筛查中结直肠癌的偶然发现及其成本效益
Am Surg. 2009 Aug;75(8):699-703; discussion 703-4.
10
Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.结肠镜切除新诊断腺瘤性息肉后监测间隔的随机对照比较。国家息肉研究工作组。
N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 1;328(13):901-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304013281301.

引用本文的文献

1
Colorectal cancer of the young displays distinct features of aggressive tumor biology: A single-center cohort study.青年结直肠癌表现出侵袭性肿瘤生物学的独特特征:一项单中心队列研究。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Feb 27;13(2):164-175. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i2.164.
2
Systematic Review of Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Risk for Metachronous Advanced Neoplasia in Patients With Young-Onset Colorectal Adenoma.青年结直肠腺瘤患者的发病情况、危险因素和异时性高级别腺瘤风险的系统评价。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Apr;19(4):680-689.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.04.092. Epub 2020 May 16.