Winawer S J, Zauber A G, O'Brien M J, Ho M N, Gottlieb L, Sternberg S S, Waye J D, Bond J, Schapiro M, Stewart E T
Gastroenterology and Nutrition Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021.
N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 1;328(13):901-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304013281301.
The identification and removal of adenomatous polyps and post-polypectomy surveillance are considered to be important for the control of colorectal cancer. In current practice, the intervals between colonoscopies after polypectomy are variable, often a year long, and not based on data from randomized clinical trials. We sought to determine whether follow-up colonoscopy at three years would detect important colonic lesions as well as follow-up colonoscopy at both one and three years.
Patients were eligible if they had one or more adenomas, no previous polypectomy, and a complete colonoscopy and all their polyps had been removed. They were randomly assigned to have follow-up colonoscopy at one and three years or at three years only. The two study end points were the detection of any adenoma, and the detection of adenomas with advanced pathological features (defined as those > 1 cm in diameter and those with high-grade dysplasia or invasive cancer).
Of 2632 eligible patients, 1418 were randomly assigned to the two follow-up groups, 699 to the two-examination group and 719 to the one-examination group. The percentage of patients with adenomas in the group examined at one and three years was 41.7 percent, as compared with 32.0 percent in the group examined at three years (P = 0.006). The percentage of patients with adenomas with advanced pathological features was the same in both groups (3.3 percent).
Colonoscopy performed three years after colonoscopic removal of adenomatous polyps detects important colonic lesions as effectively as follow-up colonoscopy after both one and three years. An interval of at least three years is recommended before follow-up colonoscopy after both one and three years. An interval of at least three years is recommended before follow-up examination after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. Adoption of this recommendation nationally should reduce the cost of post-polypectomy surveillance and screening.
腺瘤性息肉的识别与切除以及息肉切除术后的监测被认为对控制结直肠癌很重要。在当前的实践中,息肉切除术后结肠镜检查的间隔时间各不相同,通常为一年,且并非基于随机临床试验的数据。我们试图确定三年后的随访结肠镜检查是否能像一年和三年后的随访结肠镜检查一样检测出重要的结肠病变。
符合条件的患者需满足有一个或多个腺瘤、既往未行息肉切除术、接受过完整的结肠镜检查且所有息肉均已切除。他们被随机分配在一年和三年时进行随访结肠镜检查,或仅在三年时进行随访结肠镜检查。两个研究终点是检测到任何腺瘤,以及检测到具有高级别病理特征的腺瘤(定义为直径大于1 cm以及具有高级别异型增生或浸润性癌的腺瘤)。
在2632例符合条件的患者中,1418例被随机分配到两个随访组,699例分配到两次检查组,719例分配到一次检查组。在一年和三年时接受检查的组中,有腺瘤的患者百分比为41.7%,而在三年时接受检查的组中为32.0%(P = 0.006)。两组中具有高级别病理特征的腺瘤患者百分比相同(3.3%)。
结肠镜切除腺瘤性息肉三年后进行的结肠镜检查检测重要结肠病变的效果与一年和三年后的随访结肠镜检查相同。建议在结肠镜切除新诊断的腺瘤性息肉后至少间隔三年再进行随访结肠镜检查。在全国采用这一建议应能降低息肉切除术后监测和筛查的成本。