Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CSIC), c/ Darwin 3, Campus de Universidad Autónoma, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
Environ Microbiol. 2010 Apr;12(4):1021-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02146.x. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
A comparison was made of the effect of glyphosate (RoundupPlus), a post-emergency applied herbicide, and of HarnessGTZ, a pre-emergency applied herbicide, on the rhizobacterial communities of genetically modified NK603 glyphosate-tolerant maize. The potential effect was monitored by direct amplification, cloning and sequencing of soil DNA encoding 16S rRNA, rhizobacterial DNA hybridization to commercially available genome-wide microarrays from the soil bacterium Streptomyces coelicolor, and high-throughput DNA pyrosequencing of the bacterial DNA coding for 16S rRNA hypervariable V6 region. The results obtained strongly suggest that both herbicides do in fact affect the maize rhizobacterial communities, glyphosate being, to a great extent, the environmentally less aggressive herbicide.
对草甘膦(RoundupPlus),一种芽后施用的除草剂,和 HarnessGTZ,一种芽前施用的除草剂,在耐草甘膦 NK603 转基因玉米根际细菌群落的影响进行了比较。通过直接扩增、克隆和测序土壤 DNA 编码 16S rRNA、根际细菌 DNA 与土壤放线菌 Streptomyces coelicolor 商品化全基因组微阵列杂交以及细菌 16S rRNA 高变区 V6 区的高通量 DNA 焦磷酸测序来监测潜在影响。结果强烈表明,两种除草剂实际上都影响了玉米根际细菌群落,草甘膦在很大程度上是一种环境侵袭性较小的除草剂。