Laboratorio de Biodiversidad Vegetal y Microbiana, Campo Experimental J. Villarino, Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario (IICAR CONICET-UNR), Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Zavalla, Argentina.
Institute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (JKI), Julius Kühn-Institut, Braunschweig, Germany.
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 9;14(10):e0223600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223600. eCollection 2019.
Cover crop suppression with glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs) represents a common agricultural practice. The objective of this study was to compare rhizospheric microbial communities of A. sativa plants treated with a GBH relative to the mechanical suppression (mowing) in order to assess their differences and the potential implications for soil processes. Samples were obtained at 4, 10, 17 and 26 days post-suppression. Soil catabolic profiling and DNA-based methods were applied. At 26 days, higher respiration responses and functional diversity indices (Shannon index and catabolic evenness) were observed under glyphosate suppression and a neat separation of catabolic profiles was detected in multivariate analysis. Sarcosine and Tween 20 showed the highest contribution to this separation. Metabarcoding revealed a non-significant effect of suppression method on either alpha-diversity metrics or beta-diversity. Conversely, differences were detected in the relative abundance of specific bacterial taxa. Mesorhizobium sequences were detected in higher relative abundance in glyphosate-treated plants at the end of the experiment while the opposite trend was observed for Gaiella. Quantitative PCR of amoA gene from ammonia-oxidizing archaea showed a lower abundance under GBH suppression again at 26 days, while ammonia-oxidizing bacteria remained lower at all sampling times. Broad host range plasmids IncP-1β and IncP-1ε were exclusively detected in the rhizosphere of glyphosate-treated plants at 10 days and at 26 days, respectively. Overall, our study demonstrates differential effects of suppression methods on the abundance of specific bacterial taxa, on the physiology and mobile genetic elements of microbial communities while no differences were detected in taxonomic diversity.
利用草甘膦类除草剂(GBH)抑制覆盖作物是一种常见的农业实践。本研究的目的是比较用 GBH 处理的 A. sativa 植物的根际微生物群落与机械抑制(刈割),以评估它们的差异及其对土壤过程的潜在影响。在抑制后 4、10、17 和 26 天采集样品。应用土壤代谢物谱分析和基于 DNA 的方法。在 26 天时,在草甘膦抑制下观察到更高的呼吸响应和功能多样性指数(香农指数和代谢均匀度),并且在多元分析中检测到代谢物谱的明显分离。肌氨酸和吐温 20 对这种分离的贡献最大。代谢组学分析显示,抑制方法对 alpha-多样性指标或 beta-多样性没有显著影响。相反,在特定细菌类群的相对丰度上检测到差异。在实验结束时,草甘膦处理植物中检测到更高相对丰度的 Mesorhizobium 序列,而相反的趋势则在 Glyphaella 中观察到。氨氧化古菌 amoA 基因的定量 PCR 显示,在草甘膦抑制下,再次在 26 天时丰度较低,而氨氧化细菌在所有采样时间都较低。广泛宿主范围质粒 IncP-1β和 IncP-1ε仅在草甘膦处理植物的根际中分别于 10 天和 26 天检测到。总体而言,我们的研究表明,抑制方法对特定细菌类群的丰度、微生物群落的生理和可移动遗传元件有不同的影响,而在分类多样性方面没有检测到差异。