• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机断层扫描预测阑尾穿孔的准确性。

Accuracy of computed tomography in predicting appendiceal perforation.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Jan;45(1):231-4; discussion 234-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.10.040.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.10.040
PMID:20105609
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Some surgeons use nonoperative management with or without interval appendectomy for patients who present with perforated appendicitis. These strategies depend on accurately delineating perforation by computed tomography (CT). Since 2005, our institution has used an evidence-based definition for perforation as a hole in the appendix or fecalith in the abdomen. This has been shown to clearly separate those with a high risk of abscess from those without. To quantify the ability of CT to identify which patients would meet these criteria for perforation, we tested 6 surgeons and 2 radiologists who evaluated blinded CT scans.

METHODS

A junior and senior surgical residents, 2 staff interventional radiologists, and 4 attending pediatric surgeons with 3 to 30 years of experience reviewed 200 CT scans of pediatric patients who had undergone a laparoscopic appendectomy. All CT scans were reviewed electronically, and the reviewers were blinded to the results, outcome, and intraoperative findings. None of the patients had a well-formed abscess on CT. The reviewers were asked to decide only on perforated or nonperforated appendicitis according to our intraoperative definition. Clinical admission data were reviewed and compared between groups.

RESULTS

In total, the reviewers were correct 72% of the time with an overall sensitivity of 62% and a specificity of 81%. The overall positive predictive value was 67%, and the negative predictive value was 77%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that in the absence of a well-formed abscess, the triage of patient care based on a preoperative diagnosis of perforation from CT may be imprudent and subject a portion of the population to an unnecessarily prolonged course of care.

摘要

背景

一些外科医生对表现出穿孔性阑尾炎的患者采用非手术治疗(伴或不伴间隔阑尾切除术)。这些策略取决于通过计算机断层扫描(CT)准确划定穿孔的范围。自 2005 年以来,我们机构一直使用穿孔的循证定义,即阑尾有孔或腹部有粪石。这一方法可以明确区分高危脓肿和非高危脓肿患者。为了量化 CT 识别符合穿孔标准的患者的能力,我们对 6 名外科医生和 2 名放射科医生进行了测试,他们评估了盲法 CT 扫描。

方法

一名初级和一名高级外科住院医师、2 名介入放射科工作人员和 4 名具有 3 至 30 年经验的主治儿科外科医生对 200 名接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术的儿科患者的 CT 扫描进行了评估。所有 CT 扫描均通过电子方式进行评估,评估人员对结果、结果和术中发现均不知情。所有患者的 CT 均未见形成良好的脓肿。评估人员仅根据我们的术中定义,决定是穿孔性还是非穿孔性阑尾炎。查阅了临床入院数据并在组间进行了比较。

结果

评估者的正确率为 72%,总敏感度为 62%,特异性为 81%。总的阳性预测值为 67%,阴性预测值为 77%。

结论

本研究表明,在没有形成良好脓肿的情况下,根据 CT 术前诊断穿孔来分诊患者的治疗可能是不明智的,这会导致一部分患者接受不必要的延长治疗。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of computed tomography in predicting appendiceal perforation.计算机断层扫描预测阑尾穿孔的准确性。
J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Jan;45(1):231-4; discussion 234-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.10.040.
2
Differentiation of early perforated from nonperforated appendicitis: MDCT findings, MDCT diagnostic performance, and clinical outcome.早期穿孔性阑尾炎与非穿孔性阑尾炎的鉴别:多层螺旋CT表现、多层螺旋CT诊断效能及临床结局
Abdom Imaging. 2014 Jun;39(3):459-66. doi: 10.1007/s00261-014-0117-x.
3
Use and accuracy of computed tomography scan in diagnosing perforated appendicitis.计算机断层扫描在诊断穿孔性阑尾炎中的应用及准确性
Am Surg. 2015 Apr;81(4):404-7.
4
Use of Computed Tomography to Determine Perforation in Patients With Acute Appendicitis.使用计算机断层扫描确定急性阑尾炎患者的穿孔情况。
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2018 Jan-Feb;47(1):6-9. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
5
Perforated versus nonperforated acute appendicitis: accuracy of multidetector CT detection.穿孔性与非穿孔性急性阑尾炎:多层螺旋CT检测的准确性
Radiology. 2006 Dec;241(3):780-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2413051896.
6
The diagnosis of appendicitis in children: outcomes of a strategy based on pediatric surgical evaluation.儿童阑尾炎的诊断:基于小儿外科评估策略的结果
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 1):29-34. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.1.29.
7
Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources.阑尾计算机断层扫描对患者治疗及医院资源利用的影响。
N Engl J Med. 1998 Jan 15;338(3):141-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199801153380301.
8
Determination of surgical priorities in appendicitis based on the probability of undetected appendiceal perforation.基于未检测到的阑尾穿孔概率确定阑尾炎手术优先级
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 21;21(7):2131-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i7.2131.
9
Evaluation of perforated and nonperforated appendicitis with CT.CT对穿孔性和非穿孔性阑尾炎的评估。
Clin Imaging. 2004 Nov-Dec;28(6):422-7. doi: 10.1016/S0899-7071(03)00286-9.
10
An evidence-based definition for perforated appendicitis derived from a prospective randomized trial.一项基于前瞻性随机试验得出的穿孔性阑尾炎的循证定义。
J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Dec;43(12):2242-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.08.051.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrasound and computed tomography in differentiating between simple and complicated appendicitis in pediatric patients.超声和计算机断层扫描在鉴别小儿单纯性和复杂性阑尾炎中的应用。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2024 Nov 9;40(1):299. doi: 10.1007/s00383-024-05880-0.
2
Associations between Th1-related cytokines and complicated pediatric appendicitis.Th1 相关细胞因子与儿童复杂性阑尾炎的关系。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 26;14(1):4613. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53756-z.
3
Systemic inflammatory markers for distinguishing uncomplicated and complicated acute appendicitis in adult patients.
用于区分成年患者单纯性和复杂性急性阑尾炎的全身炎症标志物。
North Clin Istanb. 2023 Jul 31;10(4):507-513. doi: 10.14744/nci.2022.79027. eCollection 2023.
4
Diagnostic Algorithm Based on Machine Learning to Predict Complicated Appendicitis in Children Using CT, Laboratory, and Clinical Features.基于机器学习的诊断算法,利用CT、实验室检查和临床特征预测儿童复杂性阑尾炎
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 1;13(5):923. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13050923.
5
Scoring System for Differentiation of Complicated Appendicitis in Pediatric Patients: Appendicitis Scoring System in Children.小儿复杂性阑尾炎鉴别评分系统:儿童阑尾炎评分系统
Glob Pediatr Health. 2021 Jun 8;8:2333794X211022268. doi: 10.1177/2333794X211022268. eCollection 2021.
6
Relative CT number of periappendiceal fat stranding may be an applicable index for estimating the severity of acute appendicitis.阑尾周围脂肪条索征的相对 CT 值可能是评估急性阑尾炎严重程度的一个适用指标。
Br J Radiol. 2021 Apr 1;94(1120):20200437. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200437. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
7
Falling through the worm hole: an exploration of the imaging workup of the vermiform appendix in the pediatric population.穿越虫洞:小儿人群中阑尾影像学检查的探索
BJR Open. 2019 Sep 6;1(1):20190016. doi: 10.1259/bjro.20190016. eCollection 2019.
8
Computed tomography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adults.成人急性阑尾炎诊断的计算机断层扫描
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 19;2019(11):CD009977. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009977.pub2.
9
Accuracy of Computed Tomography in Differentiating Perforated from Nonperforated Appendicitis, Taking Histopathology as the Gold Standard.以组织病理学为金标准,计算机断层扫描在鉴别穿孔性与非穿孔性阑尾炎中的准确性
Cureus. 2018 Dec 15;10(12):e3735. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3735.
10
Perforation risk in pediatric appendicitis: assessment and management.小儿阑尾炎的穿孔风险:评估与管理
Pediatric Health Med Ther. 2018 Oct 26;9:135-145. doi: 10.2147/PHMT.S155302. eCollection 2018.