Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283, USA.
Postgrad Med. 2010 Jan;122(1):75-81. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2010.01.2101.
We assessed the relationship between emergency department (ED) crowding and delays in care in patients presenting with abdominal pain who receive abdominal computed tomography (CT).
Prospective cohort study of adults who presented over a 1-year period to 2 urban academic EDs with abdominal pain and received CT. Each subject had 3 validated crowding measures assigned at enrollment (ED census, waiting room number, number of admitted patients). These were normalized to quartiles to signify least to most crowded. The Cuzick test was used for trend and log-linear regression and tested the association between ED crowding and time from triage to CT read. The time interval was further decomposed into triage to room, room to CT order, and order to CT read times. The adjusted analysis controlled for age, sex, race, pain score, time of day, triage level, and site.
767 patients were enrolled (mean age, 44 +/- 17 years; 61% female; 60% black). Median time from triage to CT read was 375 minutes (interquartile range [IQR], 276-497). Individual time intervals included triage to room (46 minutes [IQR, 16-111]), room to CT order (83 minutes [IQR, 38-151]), and order to CT read (203 minutes [IQR, 138-375]). Across waiting room quartiles, triage to CT read was associated with progressively longer times (318 vs 364 vs 414 vs 445 minutes; P < 0.001 for trend). Similar trends were noted for waiting room number and admitted patients (P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, the association between ED crowding and time from triage to CT read remained significant and consistent across all crowding measures (P < 0.001). When decomposed into time intervals, triage to room time showed the greatest difference (22 vs 38 vs 72 vs 92 minutes; P < 0.001).
ED crowding is associated with an approximately 2-hour delay to CT interpretation availability. Attempts to reduce delays in abdominal CTs may include earlier provider evaluation and placement in the queue for scanning.
我们评估了急诊(ED)拥挤程度与接受腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)的腹痛患者治疗延迟之间的关系。
前瞻性队列研究,纳入了在 1 年内因腹痛就诊于 2 家城市学术 ED 并接受 CT 的成年患者。每位患者在入组时都有 3 项经过验证的拥挤度测量指标(ED 普查、候诊室人数、入院人数)。将这些指标进行归一化到四分位数,以表示最不拥挤到最拥挤。Cuzick 检验用于趋势和对数线性回归,并测试 ED 拥挤程度与从分诊到 CT 读取之间的时间关系。时间间隔进一步分解为分诊到房间、房间到 CT 订单和订单到 CT 读取的时间。调整分析控制了年龄、性别、种族、疼痛评分、时间、分诊级别和地点。
共纳入 767 例患者(平均年龄 44 ± 17 岁;61%为女性;60%为黑人)。从分诊到 CT 读取的中位数时间为 375 分钟(四分位距[IQR],276-497)。个别时间间隔包括分诊到房间(46 分钟[IQR,16-111])、房间到 CT 订单(83 分钟[IQR,38-151])和订单到 CT 读取(203 分钟[IQR,138-375])。在候诊室四分位数中,从分诊到 CT 读取的时间与等待时间的延长呈正相关(318 分钟 vs 364 分钟 vs 414 分钟 vs 445 分钟;趋势检验 P < 0.001)。候诊室人数和入院患者数也存在类似的趋势(P < 0.001)。多变量分析显示,ED 拥挤程度与从分诊到 CT 读取的时间之间的关联在所有拥挤度指标上均具有显著且一致的相关性(P < 0.001)。当时间间隔分解时,分诊到房间的时间差异最大(22 分钟 vs 38 分钟 vs 72 分钟 vs 92 分钟;P < 0.001)。
ED 拥挤与 CT 解释可用性延迟约 2 小时有关。减少腹部 CT 延迟的尝试可能包括更早的提供者评估和排队进行扫描。