National Centre for Audiology, School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Hearing Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Int J Audiol. 2010 Jan;49 Suppl 1:S49-63. doi: 10.3109/14992020903148038.
This paper reports real world preferences of children in a double-blind, cross-over trial comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v.4.1 prescriptions. Twenty-four children wore digital WDRC hearing aids at each site (Australia, Canada). Multi-memory hearing aids provided the NAL and DSL programs in each of two memories. Diaries were completed during two counterbalanced trials, providing overall preference, situational preference, and preference comments. Ratings were reliable, and situational preferences factored into quiet/low level situations versus noisy/reverberant/high level situations. Children at both sites used DSL v4.1 for hearing low level speech, or when they wanted to hear loudly and clearly. Children used NAL-NL1 when they wished to hear sounds at a lower level, or to reduce background noise. Children expressed strong preferences for having the choice of both programs. Canadian children were more likely to prefer DSL than were the Australian children. Factors such as listening environment and prior listening experience are discussed in interpreting these findings.
本文报告了一项真实世界的研究结果,该研究对在一项比较 NAL-NL1 和 DSL v.4.1 处方的双盲、交叉试验中的儿童偏好进行了研究。24 名儿童在每个地点(澳大利亚、加拿大)佩戴数字 WDRC 助听器。多内存助听器在两个内存中分别提供 NAL 和 DSL 程序。在两个平衡试验中完成了日记,提供了总体偏好、情境偏好和偏好评论。评分是可靠的,情境偏好因素包括安静/低水平情况与嘈杂/混响/高水平情况。两个地点的儿童都在听力低水平语音时或希望大声清晰地听到声音时使用 DSL v4.1。儿童希望听到较低水平的声音或减少背景噪音时使用 NAL-NL1。儿童强烈表示希望有选择这两个程序的自由。加拿大的儿童比澳大利亚的儿童更倾向于选择 DSL。在解释这些发现时,讨论了诸如聆听环境和先前的聆听经验等因素。