National Acoustic Laboratories, Australian Hearing, Chatswood, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Int J Audiol. 2010 Jan;49 Suppl 1:S16-25. doi: 10.3109/14992020903082096.
This paper examined how hearing aids adjusted for comparing NAL-NL1 with DSLv.4.1 prescription formulas matched prescriptive targets. The real-ear-to-coupler differences (RECD) of 48 children (24 in Australia and 24 in Canada) were measured and used to derive coupler gain targets. Verification of gain and output were carried out in an HA2-2cc coupler. Electroacoustic measurements revealed a minimal difference between NAL-NL1 and DSLv.4.1 frequency-response slopes due to practical limitations of the devices, even though the prescribed differences were large (up to 13 dB/octave). The difference in overall gain was generally achieved in the hearing aids, with DSLv.4.1 prescribing higher overall gain than NAL-NL1. The mean RECD at 4 kHz was 5 dB higher for children in Australia than in Canada. As the same RECDs were used in deriving targets for both prescriptions, this is unlikely to affect the results of the comparison. The impact of a gain difference between prescriptions on children's performance and preferences in real life is reported in separate papers.
本论文研究了为比较 NAL-NL1 与 DSLv.4.1 听力计公式而调整的助听器如何与处方目标匹配。测量了 48 名儿童(澳大利亚 24 名,加拿大 24 名)的真耳耦合差(RECD),并用于推导耦合增益目标。增益和输出验证是在 HA2-2cc 耦合器中进行的。电声测量显示,由于设备的实际限制,NAL-NL1 和 DSLv.4.1 的频率响应斜率之间几乎没有差异,尽管规定的差异很大(高达 13dB/倍频程)。助听器通常可以达到总增益的差异,其中 DSLv.4.1 规定的总增益高于 NAL-NL1。澳大利亚儿童的 4kHz 平均 RECD 比加拿大儿童高 5dB。由于为两种处方推导目标时使用了相同的 RECD,因此这不太可能影响比较结果。处方之间的增益差异对儿童在现实生活中的表现和偏好的影响在其他论文中报告。