University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Vaccine. 2010 Mar 19;28(14):2624-35. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.01.014. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
This study assessed whether the inclusion of two rotavirus (RV) vaccines in the Dutch national immunization programme is cost-effective. Costs and outcomes in unvaccinated and vaccinated populations are compared for a time period of 20 years. In the baseline, assuming competitive market forces in relation to vaccine costs, Rotarix is more cost-effective than RotaTeq, resulting in a cost-utility ratio (CUR) of euro 53,000 per DALY (third payer perspective) and euro 49,000 per DALY (societal perspective), but both considered as being not cost-effective. Vaccine-related costs, annual epidemic-size, and indirect protection are the major factors that determine cost-effectiveness of RV vaccination.
本研究评估了在荷兰国家免疫计划中纳入两种轮状病毒(RV)疫苗是否具有成本效益。在 20 年的时间内,比较了未接种疫苗和接种疫苗人群的成本和结果。在基线情况下,假设疫苗成本存在竞争市场力量,Rotarix 比 RotaTeq 更具成本效益,导致每 DALY 的成本-效用比(CUR)为 53,000 欧元(第三方支付者视角)和 49,000 欧元(社会视角),但两者均被认为不具有成本效益。疫苗相关成本、年度流行规模和间接保护是决定 RV 疫苗接种成本效益的主要因素。