Suppr超能文献

在荷兰国家免疫计划中引入轮状病毒疫苗接种是否具有成本效益?

Is it cost-effective to introduce rotavirus vaccination in the Dutch national immunization program?

机构信息

University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2010 Mar 19;28(14):2624-35. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.01.014. Epub 2010 Jan 26.

Abstract

This study assessed whether the inclusion of two rotavirus (RV) vaccines in the Dutch national immunization programme is cost-effective. Costs and outcomes in unvaccinated and vaccinated populations are compared for a time period of 20 years. In the baseline, assuming competitive market forces in relation to vaccine costs, Rotarix is more cost-effective than RotaTeq, resulting in a cost-utility ratio (CUR) of euro 53,000 per DALY (third payer perspective) and euro 49,000 per DALY (societal perspective), but both considered as being not cost-effective. Vaccine-related costs, annual epidemic-size, and indirect protection are the major factors that determine cost-effectiveness of RV vaccination.

摘要

本研究评估了在荷兰国家免疫计划中纳入两种轮状病毒(RV)疫苗是否具有成本效益。在 20 年的时间内,比较了未接种疫苗和接种疫苗人群的成本和结果。在基线情况下,假设疫苗成本存在竞争市场力量,Rotarix 比 RotaTeq 更具成本效益,导致每 DALY 的成本-效用比(CUR)为 53,000 欧元(第三方支付者视角)和 49,000 欧元(社会视角),但两者均被认为不具有成本效益。疫苗相关成本、年度流行规模和间接保护是决定 RV 疫苗接种成本效益的主要因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验