Suppr超能文献

在荷兰国家免疫计划中引入轮状病毒疫苗接种是否具有成本效益?

Is it cost-effective to introduce rotavirus vaccination in the Dutch national immunization program?

机构信息

University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2010 Mar 19;28(14):2624-35. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.01.014. Epub 2010 Jan 26.

Abstract

This study assessed whether the inclusion of two rotavirus (RV) vaccines in the Dutch national immunization programme is cost-effective. Costs and outcomes in unvaccinated and vaccinated populations are compared for a time period of 20 years. In the baseline, assuming competitive market forces in relation to vaccine costs, Rotarix is more cost-effective than RotaTeq, resulting in a cost-utility ratio (CUR) of euro 53,000 per DALY (third payer perspective) and euro 49,000 per DALY (societal perspective), but both considered as being not cost-effective. Vaccine-related costs, annual epidemic-size, and indirect protection are the major factors that determine cost-effectiveness of RV vaccination.

摘要

本研究评估了在荷兰国家免疫计划中纳入两种轮状病毒(RV)疫苗是否具有成本效益。在 20 年的时间内,比较了未接种疫苗和接种疫苗人群的成本和结果。在基线情况下,假设疫苗成本存在竞争市场力量,Rotarix 比 RotaTeq 更具成本效益,导致每 DALY 的成本-效用比(CUR)为 53,000 欧元(第三方支付者视角)和 49,000 欧元(社会视角),但两者均被认为不具有成本效益。疫苗相关成本、年度流行规模和间接保护是决定 RV 疫苗接种成本效益的主要因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验