Suppr超能文献

世界卫生组织欧洲区域疾病负担研究——一项制图工作。

Burden of disease studies in the WHO European Region-a mapping exercise.

机构信息

School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Division of Information, Evidence, Research, and Innovation, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2018 Aug 1;28(4):773-778. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cky060.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) have produced numerous global burden of disease (GBD) estimates since the 1990s, using disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). Here we attempt to identify studies that have either independent DALY estimates or build on the work of WHO and IHME, for the WHO European Region, categorize them by scope of disease analysis and geographic coverage, and briefly compare their methodology (age weighting, discounting and disability weights).

METHODS

Google and Google Scholar were used with the search terms 'DALY', 'national burden of disease', Member State names and researcher's names, covering all years. Studies were categorized as: 'specific' (fewer than five disease categories or just risk factors for a single country), 'specific, multicountry' (fewer than five disease categories or just risk factors for more than one country), 'extensive' (covering five or more but not all disease categories for one country), 'full, sub country' (covering all relevant disease categories for part of one country) and 'full, country' (covering all relevant disease categories for one country).

RESULTS

A total of 198 studies were identified: 143 'specific', 26 'specific, multicountry', 7 'extensive', 10 'full, sub country' and 12 'full, country' [England (1), Estonia (2), France (1), Romania (1), Serbia (1), Spain (3), Sweden (2) and Turkey (1)]. About 5 (20%) of the 25 examinable 'extensive', 'full, sub country' and 'full, country' studies calculated DALYs using GBD 2010 methodology.

CONCLUSIONS

Independent burden of diseases studies in Europe have been located, and categorized by scope of disease analysis and geographic coverage. Methodological choices varied between independent 'full, country' studies.

摘要

背景

自 20 世纪 90 年代以来,世界卫生组织(WHO)和健康指标与评估研究所(IHME)使用伤残调整生命年(DALY)制作了多项全球疾病负担(GBD)估计数。在此,我们尝试确定具有独立 DALY 估计数的研究,或对 WHO 和 IHME 的工作进行补充的研究,针对的是世界卫生组织欧洲区域,按疾病分析范围和地理覆盖范围对它们进行分类,并简要比较其方法(年龄加权、贴现和伤残权重)。

方法

使用 Google 和 Google Scholar 搜索引擎,检索词为“DALY”、“国家疾病负担”、会员国名称和研究人员姓名,涵盖所有年份。研究分为以下几类:“特定”(少于 5 种疾病类别或仅针对一个国家的单一风险因素)、“特定、多国”(少于 5 种疾病类别或仅针对多个国家的单一风险因素)、“广泛”(涵盖一个国家的 5 种或更多但非所有疾病类别)、“局部、次国家”(涵盖一个国家部分地区的所有相关疾病类别)和“全面、国家”(涵盖一个国家的所有相关疾病类别)。

结果

共确定了 198 项研究:143 项“特定”、26 项“特定、多国”、7 项“广泛”、10 项“局部、次国家”和 12 项“全面、国家”[英格兰(1)、爱沙尼亚(2)、法国(1)、罗马尼亚(1)、塞尔维亚(1)、西班牙(3)、瑞典(2)和土耳其(1)]。约有 5 项(20%)可检查的“广泛”、“局部、次国家”和“全面、国家”研究采用了 GBD 2010 方法计算 DALY。

结论

已找到欧洲独立疾病负担研究,并按疾病分析范围和地理覆盖范围进行分类。独立的“全面、国家”研究之间的方法学选择存在差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2be5/6093319/c21faac6bc3e/cky060f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验