• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

坦索罗辛、西洛多辛与西洛多辛联合他达拉非作为下输尿管结石药物排石疗法的比较:一项随机试验。

Comparing tamsulosin, silodosin versus silodosin plus tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy for lower ureteric stones: A randomised trial.

作者信息

Rahman Md Jawaid, Faridi M Shazib, Mibang Naloh, Singh Rajendra Sinam

机构信息

Department of Urology, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India.

出版信息

Arab J Urol. 2017 Dec 24;16(2):245-249. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.11.012. eCollection 2018 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.aju.2017.11.012
PMID:29892490
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5992261/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of tamsulosin, silodosin, and silodosin plus tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy (MET) for distal ureteric calculi.

METHODS

In all, 120 patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomised into one of three treatment arms: tamsulosin (Group A), silodosin (Group B), and silodosin plus tadalafil (Group C). The drugs were given for a maximum of 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the stone expulsion rate and secondary endpoints were stone expulsion time, number of pain episodes, and side-effects associated with MET. The follow-up period was for 4 weeks, after which ureteroscopic lithotripsy was done to remove any stones that were not expelled.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significantly higher stone expulsion rate in Group C (90%) as compared to groups A (57.5%) and B (77.5%) with a shorter mean time to stone expulsion. Also, there were statistically fewer pain episodes in Group C as compared to groups A and B. There were no serious side-effects.

CONCLUSION

The present study concludes that the combination of silodosin and tadalafil increases the ureteric stone expulsion rate and decreases the expulsion time significantly. This combination provided significantly better control of pain without any serious side-effects.

摘要

目的

比较坦索罗辛、西洛多辛以及西洛多辛联合他达拉非作为远端输尿管结石药物排石疗法(MET)的疗效。

方法

总共120例符合纳入标准的患者被随机分为三个治疗组之一:坦索罗辛组(A组)、西洛多辛组(B组)和西洛多辛联合他达拉非组(C组)。药物服用最长4周。主要终点是结石排出率,次要终点是结石排出时间、疼痛发作次数以及与药物排石疗法相关的副作用。随访期为4周,之后进行输尿管镜碎石术以清除任何未排出的结石。

结果

与A组(57.5%)和B组(77.5%)相比,C组的结石排出率在统计学上显著更高(90%),且结石排出的平均时间更短。此外,与A组和B组相比,C组的疼痛发作次数在统计学上更少。未出现严重副作用。

结论

本研究得出结论,西洛多辛和他达拉非联合使用可提高输尿管结石排出率,并显著缩短排出时间。这种联合用药能显著更好地控制疼痛,且无任何严重副作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3983/5992261/7a7922a25357/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3983/5992261/7a7922a25357/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3983/5992261/7a7922a25357/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing tamsulosin, silodosin versus silodosin plus tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy for lower ureteric stones: A randomised trial.坦索罗辛、西洛多辛与西洛多辛联合他达拉非作为下输尿管结石药物排石疗法的比较:一项随机试验。
Arab J Urol. 2017 Dec 24;16(2):245-249. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.11.012. eCollection 2018 Jun.
2
Comparative efficacy of tadalafil versus tamsulosin as the medical expulsive therapy in lower ureteric stone: a prospective randomized trial.他达拉非与坦索罗辛作为输尿管下段结石药物排石疗法的疗效比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Cent European J Urol. 2016;69(2):178-82. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2016.766. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
3
Role of tamsulosin, tadalafil, and silodosin as the medical expulsive therapy in lower ureteric stone: a randomized trial (a pilot study).坦索罗辛、他达拉非和西洛多辛作为输尿管下段结石药物排石疗法的作用:一项随机试验(一项初步研究)。
Urology. 2015 Jan;85(1):59-63. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.09.022.
4
Medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteric stones: tamsulosin versus silodosin.远端输尿管结石的药物排石治疗:坦索罗辛与西洛多辛的比较
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2014 Jun 30;86(2):103-7. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2014.2.103.
5
A Comparison Between Silodosin and Tamsulosin for Medical Expulsive Therapy of Distal Ureteric Calculus.西洛多辛与坦索罗辛用于远端输尿管结石药物排石治疗的比较
Cureus. 2023 Oct 14;15(10):e47008. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47008. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
Dexketoprofen vs. Tamsulosin vs. Silodosin vs. Tadalafil as Medical Expulsive Therapy for Distal Ureteral Stones in Men.双氯芬酸酯对比坦索罗辛对比索利那新对比他达拉非在男性中用于治疗远端输尿管结石的医学排石治疗。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2021 Aug;31(8):947-952. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2021.08.947.
7
Tadalafil versus alpha blockers (alfuzosin, doxazosin, tamsulosin and silodosin) as medical expulsive therapy for < 10 mm distal and proximal ureteral stones.他达拉非与α受体阻滞剂(阿夫唑嗪、多沙唑嗪、坦索罗辛和西洛多辛)作为<10毫米远端和近端输尿管结石的药物排石疗法。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2018 Jun 30;90(2):117-122. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2018.2.117.
8
Comparison of efficacy of various drugs used for medical expulsive therapy for distal ureter stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较各种药物用于医学排石疗法治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Sep;75(9):e14214. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14214. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
9
Comparing silodosin and mirabegron as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral calculus: a prospective, randomised study.比较西洛多辛和米拉贝隆作为远端输尿管结石药物排石疗法的效果:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Cent European J Urol. 2024;77(2):286-290. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2023.182. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
10
Silodosin versus Tamsulosin as Medical Expulsive Therapy for Children with Lower-Third Ureteric Stones: Prospective Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study.西洛多辛与坦索罗辛用于儿童下三分之一段输尿管结石的排石治疗:前瞻性随机安慰剂对照研究。
Urol Int. 2021;105(7-8):568-573. doi: 10.1159/000513074. Epub 2021 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing efficacy and safety of monotherapy and combination therapy with tadalafil, tamsulosin, and silodosin for distal ureteral stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis.他达拉非、坦索罗辛和西洛多辛单药治疗与联合治疗远端输尿管结石的疗效和安全性比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Asian J Urol. 2025 Apr;12(2):189-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2024.05.003. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
2
Efficacy of Silodosin and Tadalafil monotherapy versus combination of both drugs as MET for distal ureteric stones: A prospective, double blinded, randomized clinical trial.西洛多辛与他达拉非单药治疗及两药联合作为远端输尿管结石的体外冲击波碎石术的疗效:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机临床试验。
Arab J Urol. 2024 Sep 16;23(2):124-130. doi: 10.1080/20905998.2024.2403274. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Trends of 'urolithiasis: interventions, simulation, and laser technology' over the last 16 years (2000-2015) as published in the literature (PubMed): a systematic review from European section of Uro-technology (ESUT).过去 16 年(2000-2015 年)文献(PubMed)发表的“尿石症:干预、模拟和激光技术”趋势:欧洲泌尿外科技术协会(ESUT)的系统评价。
World J Urol. 2017 Nov;35(11):1651-1658. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2055-z. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
2
Tadalafil Facilitates the Distal Ureteral Stone Expulsion: A Meta-Analysis.他达拉非促进远端输尿管结石排出:一项荟萃分析。
J Endourol. 2017 Jun;31(6):557-563. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0837. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
3
Which combination of medical expulsive therapy is more effective for treatment of distal ureteral stone in adults? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.哪种药物排石疗法组合对成人远端输尿管结石的治疗更有效?一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。
BMC Urol. 2025 Jan 28;25(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01679-2.
4
Comparative study between silodosin, tamsulosin, silodosin plus tadalafil, and tamsulosin plus tadalafil as a medical expulsive therapy for lower ureteral stones: a prospective randomized trial.西洛多辛、坦索罗辛、西洛多辛联合他达拉非以及坦索罗辛联合他达拉非作为输尿管下段结石药物排石疗法的比较研究:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jun;57(6):1827-1833. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04356-3. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
5
Comparing silodosin and mirabegron as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral calculus: a prospective, randomised study.比较西洛多辛和米拉贝隆作为远端输尿管结石药物排石疗法的效果:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Cent European J Urol. 2024;77(2):286-290. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2023.182. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
6
Optimum combined MET according to tolerability with efficacy, Silodosin Tadalafil versus Silodosin Vardenafil for distal ureteric stone: a prospective, double blinded, randomized clinical trial.根据耐受性与疗效确定的最佳联合MET,西洛多辛与他达拉非对比西洛多辛与伐地那非治疗远端输尿管结石:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机临床试验。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jan;57(1):99-106. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04147-w. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
7
Inhibition of PDE-4 isoenzyme attenuates frequency and overall contractility of agonist-evoked ureteral phasic contractions.抑制 PDE-4 同工酶可减弱激动剂诱导的输尿管相收缩的频率和整体收缩性。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2024 Feb;12(1):e1175. doi: 10.1002/prp2.1175.
8
Silodosin versus Tamsulosin for Medical Expulsive Therapy of Ureteral Stones: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.西洛多辛与坦索罗辛用于输尿管结石的药物排石治疗:一项更新的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Dec 6;58(12):1794. doi: 10.3390/medicina58121794.
9
Comparison of efficacy of three commonly used alpha-blockers as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureter stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.三种常用α受体阻滞剂作为医学排石疗法治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Sep-Oct;48(5):742-759. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0548.
10
Efficacy of Tamsulosin plus Tadalafil versus Tamsulosin as Medical Expulsive Therapy for Lower Ureteric Stones: A Randomized Controlled Trial.坦索罗辛联合他达拉非与坦索罗辛作为输尿管下段结石药物排石疗法的疗效:一项随机对照试验
Adv Urol. 2020 Jan 29;2020:4347598. doi: 10.1155/2020/4347598. eCollection 2020.
Silodosin vs tamsulosin in the management of distal ureteric stones: A prospective randomised study.
西洛多辛与坦索罗辛治疗远端输尿管结石的前瞻性随机研究。
Arab J Urol. 2016 Mar;14(1):12-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
4
Sildenafil citrate as a medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteric stones: A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study.枸橼酸西地那非作为远端输尿管结石的药物排石疗法:一项随机双盲安慰剂对照研究。
Arab J Urol. 2016 Mar;14(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2015.12.001. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
5
Silodosin and tadalafil have synergistic inhibitory effects on nerve-mediated contractions of human and rat isolated prostates.西洛多辛和他达拉非对人及大鼠前列腺组织的神经介导性收缩具有协同抑制作用。
Eur J Pharmacol. 2014 Dec 5;744:42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.09.030. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
6
Tamsulosin versus tamsulosin plus tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy for lower ureteric stones: a randomized controlled trial.坦索罗辛与坦索罗辛联合他达拉非作为输尿管下段结石药物排石治疗的随机对照试验
Int J Urol. 2014 Oct;21(10):1012-5. doi: 10.1111/iju.12496. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
7
In vivo evaluation of the chemical composition of urinary stones using dual-energy CT.使用双能 CT 对尿石化学成分进行体内评估。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jul;197(1):W76-83. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5217.
8
Tamsulosin versus Alfuzosin in the Treatment of Patients with Distal Ureteral Stones: Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study.坦索罗辛与阿夫唑嗪治疗远端输尿管结石患者的前瞻性、随机、对照研究
Korean J Urol. 2010 Mar;51(3):193-7. doi: 10.4111/kju.2010.51.3.193. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
9
Efficacy of tamsulosin in the management of lower ureteral stones: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of 100 patients.坦索罗辛治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效:100 例患者随机双盲安慰剂对照研究。
Urology. 2010 Jan;75(1):4-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.073.
10
Medical therapy to facilitate the passage of stones: what is the evidence?促进结石排出的医学疗法:证据是什么?
Eur Urol. 2009 Sep;56(3):455-71. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.012. Epub 2009 Jun 21.