Infectious Disease Division, Winthrop-University Hospital, Mineola, New York 11501, USA.
Heart Lung. 2010 Jan-Feb;39(1):64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2009.01.004. Epub 2009 Jul 10.
Subacute bacterial endocarditis (SBE) is an infection of the heart involving damaged valves or endothelium. The most common organisms causing SBE are the viridans streptococci. Viridans streptococci differ in their propensity to cause SBE, which is related to the ability to adhere to damaged heart valves and endothelium, which is a function of extracellular matrix production. Streptococcus intermedius is a member of the S. anginosus group. S. intermedius is one of the many strains of viridans streptococci and a rare cause of SBE. SBE may result following a high-grade, sustained veridans streptococcal bacteremia in patients with predisposing cardiac lesions. Because viridans streptococci are relatively avirulent pathogens in normal hosts, they usually present as SBE. Some strains of viridans streptococci are inherently more virulent (eg, S. intermedius) and clinically resemble S. lugdunensis or S. aureus.
We report a case of S. intermedius SBE in a patient with mitral valve prolapse (MVP). Throughout the patient's life, she received antibiotic prophylaxis for dental procedures and never developed SBE. Because of changes in endocarditis prophylaxis guidelines in 2007, recommending no prophylaxis for dental procedures in patients with MVP, she did not receive prophylaxis for a dental procedure 3 months before admission. The change in prophylaxis recommendations was based on the relatively low incidence of endocarditis with certain cardiac lesions. The recommendations were also based on concern for antibiotic resistance from widespread antibiotic use for antibiotic prophylaxis. There has been no appreciable increase in penicillin resistance, and antimicrobial resistance is not an important consideration among the viridans streptococci. The incidence of SBE is not high after dental procedures in patients with MVP, but if SBE occurs, it may result in serious consequence for the patient.
In this case, the patient developed S. intermedius, mitral valve SBE complicated by a cerebral vascular accident, and embolic occlusion of her leg. She was given optimal antibiotic treatment with ceftriaxone 2 g (intravenously) every 24 hours plus gentamicin 120 mg (intravenously) every 24 hours (synergy dose) but failed to respond to antimicrobial therapy. Although her S. intermedius bacteremia was rapidly cleared with antimicrobial therapy, sterilization of her vegetation was not accomplished, and during therapy, the size of her cardiac vegetation actually increased in size. Because of therapeutic failure despite optimal antibiotic therapy, the increasing size of her vegetation necessitated mitral valve replacement, which the patient underwent. Reasons for apparent/real antibiotic failure include inappropriate antimicrobial therapy, inadequately dosed antimicrobial therapy, antibiotic "tolerance," or increased pathogen virulence. Her strain of S. intermedius was sensitive to all antibiotics and not due to a "tolerant strain", i.e., her minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) were the same (<0.25 microg/mL).
In this case, despite optimal antimicrobial therapy, and in the absence of resistance/tolerance, therapeutic failure was best explained on the basis of S. intermedius virulence. The take-home lesson for clinicians is that it is better to err on the side of antibiotic prophylaxis even in patients with low-risk cardiac lesions. Failure to administer antibiotic prophylaxis for dental procedures may result in SBE and have disastrous consequences for the patient, which, in this case, resulted in a cerebral vascular accident, embolic occlusion of the leg, and mitral valve replacement. In terms of virulence in patients with endocarditis, S. intermedius may resemble S. lugdenesis.
亚急性细菌性心内膜炎(SBE)是一种涉及受损瓣膜或内皮的心脏感染。引起 SBE 的最常见病原体是草绿色链球菌。草绿色链球菌在引起 SBE 的倾向方面有所不同,这与它们黏附受损心脏瓣膜和内皮的能力有关,而这是细胞外基质产生的功能。中间链球菌是咽峡炎链球菌群的成员。中间链球菌是许多草绿色链球菌菌株之一,也是 SBE 的罕见病因。SBE 可能是由于患有易患心脏病变的患者发生高级别、持续的草绿色链球菌菌血症引起的。由于草绿色链球菌在正常宿主中是相对无毒的病原体,因此它们通常表现为 SBE。一些草绿色链球菌菌株固有地更具毒力(例如中间链球菌),并且在临床上类似于路邓葡萄球菌或金黄色葡萄球菌。
我们报告了一例中间链球菌 SBE 病例,患者患有二尖瓣脱垂(MVP)。在患者的一生中,她因牙科手术接受了抗生素预防治疗,从未发生过 SBE。由于 2007 年心内膜炎预防指南发生变化,建议 MVP 患者的牙科手术无需预防治疗,因此她在入院前 3 个月未接受预防治疗。预防治疗建议的改变是基于某些心脏病变的心内膜炎相对较低的发病率。建议还基于广泛使用抗生素进行抗生素预防治疗引起的抗生素耐药性的担忧。青霉素耐药性并没有明显增加,而且在草绿色链球菌中,抗菌药物耐药性并不是一个重要的考虑因素。MVP 患者牙科手术后 SBE 的发生率并不高,但如果发生 SBE,可能会给患者带来严重后果。
在本例中,患者发生了中间链球菌、二尖瓣 SBE 合并脑血管意外和腿部血管栓塞。她接受了头孢曲松 2 g(静脉注射)每 24 小时一次加庆大霉素 120 mg(静脉注射)每 24 小时一次(协同剂量)的最佳抗生素治疗,但对抗菌治疗无反应。尽管她的中间链球菌菌血症在抗生素治疗后迅速清除,但她的感染病灶未能被清除,并且在治疗过程中,她的心脏感染病灶实际上增大了。尽管进行了最佳的抗生素治疗,但治疗失败,需要更换二尖瓣,患者接受了该手术。明显/真正的抗生素治疗失败的原因包括不适当的抗菌治疗、剂量不足的抗菌治疗、抗生素“耐受性”或病原体毒力增加。她的中间链球菌株对所有抗生素均敏感,并非由于“耐受菌株”,即她的最小抑菌浓度(MIC)和最小杀菌浓度(MBC)相同(<0.25μg/mL)。
在本例中,尽管进行了最佳的抗生素治疗,且不存在耐药/耐受,但基于中间链球菌的毒力,治疗失败的原因最好解释为中间链球菌的毒力。临床医生的经验教训是,即使对于低危心脏病变患者,也最好进行抗生素预防治疗。如果不进行牙科手术的抗生素预防治疗,可能会导致 SBE,并给患者带来灾难性后果,在本例中,患者发生了脑血管意外、腿部血管栓塞和二尖瓣置换。在患有心内膜炎的患者中,中间链球菌的毒力可能类似于路邓葡萄球菌。