Suppr超能文献

一项评估氯化十六烷基吡啶漱口液对牙菌斑细菌抗菌效果的随机、双盲临床研究。

A randomized, double-blind clinical study to assess the antimicrobial effects of a cetylpyridinium chloride mouth rinse on dental plaque bacteria.

机构信息

Department of Preventive Dentistry, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2009 Nov;31(11):2540-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.11.004.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies with cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) mouth rinses that range from 1 use to 6 months of use have documented the clinical efficacy of these formulations on supragingival plaque and gingivitis.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to compare the effects of a commercially available mouth rinse containing 0.05% CPC versus a fluoride mouth rinse on the anaerobic bacteria found in dental plaque. Antimicrobial effects on the organisms of the supragingival plaque, a natural biofilm, were determined after 1 use and after 14 days of use of each mouth rinse.

METHODS

After enrollment, adult subjects from China completed a 1-week washout period and provided baseline samples of supragingival plaque for analysis of anaerobic bacteria. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive a commercially available mouth rinse formulated with 0.05% CPC or a fluoride mouth rinse. Subjects were assigned to each group according to a computer-generated randomization sequence. They were instructed to rinse with 20 mL of either the CPC or the fluoride mouth rinse for 30 seconds. Microbiologic analyses of dental plaque samples were conducted 12 hours after the first use of assigned mouth rinse. Subjects were instructed to continue twice-daily rinsing with their assigned mouth rinse for the next 14 days in addition to brushing their teeth with a commercial fluoride toothpaste. Dental plaque samples for microbiologic analyses were collected on day 15; this was done 12 hours after the final use of the assigned mouth rinses. A dentist conducted oral examinations before each sample collection to evaluate hard and soft tissue health over the course of the study.

RESULTS

The study included 117 adults (62 females, mean age, 28.70 years; 55 males, mean age, 30.41 years). Subjects rinsing with the CPC mouthwash (n = 58; mean age, 29.41 years) reported significant reductions in anaerobic bacteria versus those issued the fluoride rinse (n = 59; mean age, 29.61 years) 12 hours after 1 use and 12 hours after 14 days of use (P < 0.001). The mean percent reduction in anaerobic bacteria between the CPC mouth rinse and the fluoride mouth rinse was 29.98% after 1 use and 57.90% after 14 days of use. All enrolled subjects completed the study without any adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Use of the CPC mouth rinse was associated with significant reductions in the anaerobic bacteria of supragingival plaque compared with fluoride mouth rinse use in these adult subjects.

摘要

背景

使用西吡氯铵(CPC)漱口液的研究范围从 1 次使用到 6 个月,这些研究已经证明了这些配方对龈上菌斑和牙龈炎的临床疗效。

目的

本研究的目的是比较市售含 0.05%CPC 的漱口液与含氟漱口液对牙菌斑中发现的厌氧细菌的影响。使用两种漱口液 1 次和 14 天后,对龈上菌斑中生物体的抗菌效果进行了评估,龈上菌斑是一种天然生物膜。

方法

入组后,来自中国的成年受试者完成了 1 周的洗脱期,并提供了龈上菌斑的基线样本,用于分析厌氧细菌。受试者被随机分配接受市售的 0.05%CPC 配方或含氟漱口液。根据计算机生成的随机序列将受试者分配到每组。他们被指示用 20 毫升 CPC 或氟化物漱口液漱口 30 秒。第一次使用指定的漱口液后 12 小时进行牙菌斑样本的微生物分析。受试者被指示在接下来的 14 天内每天两次用分配的漱口液漱口,此外还使用含氟牙膏刷牙。在第 15 天(即最后一次使用指定漱口水后 12 小时)收集牙菌斑样本进行微生物分析。在研究过程中,每次样本采集前,牙医都会进行口腔检查,以评估软硬组织的健康状况。

结果

该研究纳入了 117 名成年人(62 名女性,平均年龄 28.70 岁;55 名男性,平均年龄 30.41 岁)。与使用含氟漱口水的受试者(n=59;平均年龄 29.61 岁)相比,使用 CPC 漱口水的受试者(n=58;平均年龄 29.41 岁)在第 1 次使用后 12 小时和第 14 天使用后 12 小时,厌氧细菌数量显著减少(P<0.001)。与使用氟化物漱口水相比,CPC 漱口水在第 1 次使用后和第 14 天使用后厌氧菌的平均百分比减少分别为 29.98%和 57.90%。所有入组受试者均完成了研究,没有任何不良事件。

结论

与使用含氟漱口水相比,在这些成年受试者中,使用 CPC 漱口水可显著减少龈上菌斑中的厌氧细菌。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验