National Programme on Substance Abuse Deaths (np-SAD), International Centre for Drug Policy, St George's, University of London, London, UK. F.Schifano @ herts.ac.uk
Neuropsychobiology. 2010;61(3):122-30. doi: 10.1159/000279302. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Despite being amphetamine derivatives, MDMA and its analogues show a number of clinical pharmacological differences with respect to both amphetamine (AMP) and methylamphetamine (METH). We aimed here at reporting and analysing information relating to the socio-demographics and clinical circumstances of the AMP-type stimulant-related deaths for the whole of the UK.
Data (1997-2007) were taken from the National Programme on Substance Abuse Deaths (np-SAD) database, collecting information from UK coroners/procurators fiscal. To calculate rates of fatalities per 100,000 users, appropriate AMP/METH and ecstasy users' numbers were taken from the 2001-2007 British Crime Survey.
Overall, 832 AMP/METH- and 605 ecstasy (mostly MDMA and methylenedioxyamphetamine/MDA)-related deaths were respectively identified. In comparison with AMP/METH victims, the ecstasy ones were more likely to be younger (28.3 vs. 32.7 years; p < 0.0001) and less likely to be known as drug users (PR = 1.9; CI 1.5-2.6). Ecstasy was more likely to be identified on its own than AMP/METH (p = 0.0192). Contributory factors were more frequently mentioned by coroners in the 'AMP/METH-only' (106 cases) group than in the 'ecstasy-only' (104 cases) one (p = 0.0043). Both poly- and monodrug AMP/METH fatalities per 100,000 16- to 59-year-old users were significantly more represented than ecstasy fatalities (respectively 17.87 +/- 4.77 deaths vs. 10.89 +/- 1.27; p = 0.000; 2.09 +/- 0.88 vs. 1.75 +/- 0.56; p = 0.0096). However, mono-intoxication ecstasy fatalities per 100,000 16- to 24-year-old users were significantly more represented than AMP/METH fatalities (1.67 +/- 0.52 vs. 0.8 +/- 0.65; p = 0.0007).
With respect to AMP/METH, ecstasy was here more typically identified in victims who were young, healthy, and less likely to be known as drug users. AMP/METH high mortality rates may be explained by users' high levels of physical co-morbidity; excess ecstasy-related fatality rates in young users may be a reason for concern. Although the coroners' response rate was of 90-95%, study limitations include both reporting inconsistency over time and lack of routine information on drug intake levels prior to death.
背景/目的:尽管属于苯丙胺衍生物,MDMA 及其类似物在与苯丙胺(AMP)和甲基苯丙胺(METH)相关的临床药理学方面表现出许多差异。我们旨在报告和分析与整个英国的 AMP 型兴奋剂相关死亡的社会人口统计学和临床情况相关的信息。
数据(1997-2007 年)取自国家药物滥用死亡计划(np-SAD)数据库,该数据库收集了英国验尸官/检察官财政部门的信息。为了计算每 10 万名使用者的死亡率,我们从 2001-2007 年英国犯罪调查中获取了适当的 AMP/METH 和摇头丸(主要是 MDMA 和亚甲二氧基苯丙胺/MDA)使用者数量。
总共分别确定了 832 例 AMP/METH 和 605 例摇头丸(主要是 MDMA 和亚甲二氧基苯丙胺/MDA)相关死亡。与 AMP/METH 受害者相比,摇头丸受害者更年轻(28.3 岁对 32.7 岁;p<0.0001),且不太可能被认定为吸毒者(PR=1.9;CI 1.5-2.6)。摇头丸比 AMP/METH 更有可能单独被识别(p=0.0192)。验尸官在“仅 AMP/METH”(106 例)组中比在“仅摇头丸”(104 例)组中更频繁地提到促成因素(p=0.0043)。每 10 万名 16 至 59 岁使用者的多药和单药 AMP/METH 死亡率明显高于摇头丸死亡率(分别为 17.87+/-4.77 例与 10.89+/-1.27 例;p=0.000;2.09+/-0.88 例与 1.75+/-0.56 例;p=0.0096)。然而,每 10 万名 16 至 24 岁使用者的单药摇头丸死亡率明显高于 AMP/METH 死亡率(1.67+/-0.52 例与 0.8+/-0.65 例;p=0.0007)。
与 AMP/METH 相比,摇头丸在年轻、健康且不太可能被认定为吸毒者的受害者中更典型。AMP/METH 高死亡率可能是由于使用者身体合并症水平较高所致;年轻使用者过量的摇头丸相关死亡率可能是一个令人担忧的原因。尽管验尸官的回应率为 90-95%,但研究的局限性包括随着时间的推移报告的不一致性以及缺乏死亡前常规药物摄入水平的信息。