Schmidt P J, Nieman L K, Grover G N, Muller K L, Merriam G R, Rubinow D R
Section on Behavioral Endocrinology, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
N Engl J Med. 1991 Apr 25;324(17):1174-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199104253241705.
No physiologic abnormality of the luteal phase has been consistently demonstrated in women with premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Using the progesterone antagonist mifepristone, we truncated the late luteal phase of the menstrual cycle in a blinded fashion to evaluate the relation of the events of the late luteal phase to the symptoms of PMS.
Fourteen women with PMS were given mifepristone (12.5 or 25 mg per kilogram of body weight) by mouth on the seventh day after the surge of luteinizing hormone. On the sixth through the eighth days after the surge, they also received injections of either placebo or human chorionic gonadotropin (2000 IU). Seven women with PMS received placebo instead of both mifepristone and human chorionic gonadotropin. All the women completed daily questionnaires measuring a variety of mood-related and somatic symptoms.
Mifepristone consistently induced menses. The women receiving only mifepristone had plasma progesterone levels like those of the follicular phase (less than 3 nmol per liter) within four days, whereas all the other women had plasma progesterone levels characteristic of the luteal phase (greater than 8 nmol per liter) for at least seven days after treatment. In all three groups, the severity of symptoms was significantly higher after treatment than before, according to an analysis of variance with repeated measures. The level and pattern of the ratings of symptom severity were similar in all treatment groups.
Neither the timing nor the severity of PMS symptoms was altered by mifepristone-induced menses or luteolysis. The temporal association of typical PMS symptoms with an artificially induced follicular phase suggests that endocrine events during the late luteal phase do not directly generate the symptoms of PMS.
经前综合征(PMS)女性患者的黄体期尚未一致证实存在生理异常。我们使用孕激素拮抗剂米非司酮,以盲法缩短月经周期的黄体晚期,以评估黄体晚期事件与经前综合征症状之间的关系。
14名经前综合征女性在促黄体生成素高峰后第7天口服米非司酮(每公斤体重12.5或25毫克)。在高峰后的第6至8天,她们还接受了安慰剂或人绒毛膜促性腺激素(2000国际单位)注射。7名经前综合征女性接受安慰剂,而非米非司酮和人绒毛膜促性腺激素。所有女性均完成了每日问卷,测量各种与情绪和躯体相关的症状。
米非司酮持续诱导月经来潮。仅接受米非司酮治疗的女性在4天内血浆孕酮水平与卵泡期相似(低于3纳摩尔/升),而所有其他女性在治疗后至少7天内血浆孕酮水平具有黄体期特征(高于8纳摩尔/升)。根据重复测量方差分析,所有三组治疗后症状严重程度均显著高于治疗前。所有治疗组症状严重程度评分的水平和模式相似。
米非司酮诱导的月经来潮或黄体溶解既未改变经前综合征症状的发生时间,也未改变其严重程度。典型经前综合征症状与人工诱导的卵泡期的时间关联表明,黄体晚期的内分泌事件不会直接引发经前综合征症状。