Suppr超能文献

中心静脉压测量提高了抬腿引起的脉搏压变化预测液体反应性的准确性。

Central venous pressure measurements improve the accuracy of leg raising-induced change in pulse pressure to predict fluid responsiveness.

机构信息

Service de Réanimation Médicale et Maladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2010 Jun;36(6):940-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1755-2. Epub 2010 Jan 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Passive leg raising (PLR) is a maneuver performed to test the cardiac Frank-Starling mechanism. We assessed the influence of PLR-induced changes in preload on the performance of PLR-induced change in pulse pressure (Delta(PLR)PP) and cardiac output (Delta(PLR)CO) for fluid responsiveness prediction.

METHODS

Sedated, nonarrhythmic patients with persistent shock were included in this prospective multicenter study. Cardiac output and pulse pressure were measured at baseline (patient supine), during PLR (lower limbs lifted to 45 degrees) and after 500-ml volume expansion. Patients were classified as responders or not.

RESULTS

In the whole population (n = 102), the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.76 for Delta(PLR)PP and was higher for Delta(PLR)CO (0.89)(p < 0.05), but likelihood ratios were close to 1. In patients with a PLR-induced increase in central venous pressure (CVP) of at least 2 mmHg (n = 49), Delta(PLR)PP and Delta(PLR)CO disclosed higher AUCs than in the rest of the population (0.91 vs. 0.66 and 0.98 vs. 0.83; p < 0.05); positive/negative likelihood ratios were 9.3/0.14 (8% cutoff level) and 30/0.07 (7% cutoff level), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A PLR-induced change in CVP > or =2 mmHg was required to allow clinical usefulness of PLR-derived indices. In this situation, Delta(PLR)PP performed well for predicting fluid responsiveness in deeply sedated patients.

摘要

目的

被动抬腿(PLR)是一种用于测试心脏 Frank-Starling 机制的操作。我们评估了预负荷变化对 PLR 诱导的脉搏压变化(Delta(PLR)PP)和心输出量变化(Delta(PLR)CO)性能的影响,以预测液体反应性。

方法

这项前瞻性多中心研究纳入了持续休克的镇静非心律失常患者。在基线(患者仰卧位)、PLR 期间(下肢抬高至 45 度)和 500 毫升容量扩张后测量心输出量和脉搏压。患者被分为有反应者和无反应者。

结果

在整个人群(n=102)中,Delta(PLR)PP 的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.76,Delta(PLR)CO 的 AUC 更高(0.89)(p<0.05),但似然比接近 1。在 PLR 引起中心静脉压(CVP)升高至少 2mmHg 的患者(n=49)中,Delta(PLR)PP 和 Delta(PLR)CO 的 AUC 高于其余人群(0.91 与 0.66 和 0.98 与 0.83;p<0.05);阳性/阴性似然比分别为 9.3/0.14(8%截断值)和 30/0.07(7%截断值)。

结论

需要 PLR 引起的 CVP 变化 >或=2mmHg 才能使 PLR 衍生指数具有临床实用性。在这种情况下,Delta(PLR)PP 可很好地预测深度镇静患者的液体反应性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验