Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, 5 East 98th Street, Box 1259, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2010 Aug;24(8):1886-91. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0865-9. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
Laparoscopic-assisted colon resection has been shown to result in earlier return of bowel function, decreased postoperative pain, decreased length of stay, and decreased morbidity when compared to open resection. Laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy often still involves externalization of the bowel for resection and anastomosis. The aim of this study was to determine short-term outcomes of performing intra- versus extracorporeal resection and anastomosis in laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy.
Retrospective chart review of 105 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy or colectomy by a single surgeon from January 2006 through August 2008 was performed. Pearson chi(2) and Student's t test were used to test for significance.
There were 105 patients in total who underwent laparoscopic-assisted ileocolic resection (66), right hemicolectomy (29), left hemicolectomy (9), and subtotal colectomy (1). There were more males in the extracorporeal group, but patients in the two groups were otherwise demographically comparable. An intracorporeal anastomosis was performed in 54 patients and extracorporeal in 51 patients. The operation was longer in the intracorporeal group (p <or= 0.001), but estimated blood loss was less (p = 0.014). Postoperatively, there was no significant difference in time to bowel movement between the intra- and extracorporeal anastomosis groups; however, there was earlier return of flatus (2 vs. 2.4 days, respectively; p = 0.017). Postoperative narcotic use (16 vs. 49 mg morphine equivalents; p = 0.001), length of stay (3.2 vs. 3.8 days; p = 0.012), and perioperative morbidity (6 vs. 15 patients; p = 0.019) were all decreased in the intra- versus extracorporeal group, respectively. There was no perioperative mortality.
In comparison to the extracorporeal technique, resection and creation of the anastomosis intracorporeally produces superior results with earlier return of bowel function, decreased postoperative narcotic use, and decreased length of stay and morbidity. Further studies will be needed to verify our findings.
与开放式切除术相比,腹腔镜辅助结肠切除术可更早地恢复肠道功能,减轻术后疼痛,缩短住院时间,并降低发病率。腹腔镜辅助半结肠切除术通常仍需要将肠外置以进行切除和吻合。本研究旨在确定腹腔镜辅助半结肠切除术中进行腔内与腔外切除和吻合的短期结果。
对 2006 年 1 月至 2008 年 8 月期间由同一位外科医生进行的 105 例连续腹腔镜辅助半结肠切除术或结肠切除术患者进行回顾性图表分析。使用 Pearson chi(2)和 Student's t 检验来检测显著性。
共有 105 例患者接受了腹腔镜辅助回结肠切除术(66 例)、右半结肠切除术(29 例)、左半结肠切除术(9 例)和次全结肠切除术(1 例)。腔外组中男性更多,但两组患者在其他方面的人口统计学特征相似。54 例患者进行了腔内吻合,51 例患者进行了腔外吻合。腔内组的手术时间更长(p ≤ 0.001),但估计出血量较少(p = 0.014)。术后,两组患者的肠蠕动恢复时间无显著差异;然而,腔内吻合组更早出现排气(分别为 2 天和 2.4 天;p = 0.017)。术后使用阿片类药物(16 毫克吗啡当量与 49 毫克吗啡当量;p = 0.001)、住院时间(3.2 天与 3.8 天;p = 0.012)和围手术期发病率(6 例与 15 例;p = 0.019)均分别降低。无围手术期死亡。
与腔外技术相比,腔内进行切除和吻合术可更早地恢复肠道功能,减少术后阿片类药物使用,并缩短住院时间和降低发病率。需要进一步的研究来验证我们的发现。