• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声骨刀与传统旋转器械在下颌第三磨牙拔除术中的随机临床评估。

A randomized clinical evaluation of ultrasound bone surgery versus traditional rotary instruments in lower third molar extraction.

作者信息

Barone Antonio, Marconcini Simone, Giacomelli Luca, Rispoli Lorena, Calvo Josè Louis, Covani Ugo

机构信息

Department of Oral Pathology and Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Feb;68(2):330-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.03.053. Epub 2010 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2009.03.053
PMID:20116704
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare, in a randomized and controlled clinical trial, the use of ultrasound bone surgery devices and the use of rotary instruments in lower third molar extractions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We selected 26 patients (12 women and 14 men) for this study; the mean age was 31.2 years (range, 24-45 years). A randomized clinical trial was planned. Patients in the control group received treatment with the conventional rotary instruments; patients in the test group received treatment with the ultrasound bone surgery tools. Twenty-six third molars were allocated to the test and control groups according to a computer-generated randomization list. All the surgical procedures were performed by the same surgeon. Pain, trismus, cheek swelling, and number of analgesics taken were evaluated at baseline (before surgery) and at the first-, third-, fifth-, and seventh-day visits.

RESULTS

Pain levels (evaluated on a visual analog scale) were higher in the control group when compared with the ultrasonic group; however, no statistically significant differences were found. On the contrary, the number of analgesics taken in the test group was significantly lower when compared with the control group. The occurrence of trismus was significantly higher in the control group when compared with the test group. The clinical values of cheek swelling were higher in the rotary group when compared with the ultrasound group at the fifth-day visit.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the use of ultrasound bone surgery for third molar extraction significantly reduced the occurrence of postsurgical trismus, the occurrence of swelling, and the number of analgesics taken after surgery.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过一项随机对照临床试验,调查和比较超声骨手术器械与旋转器械在拔除下颌第三磨牙中的应用。

材料与方法

我们选取了26例患者(12名女性和14名男性)进行本研究;平均年龄为31.2岁(范围24 - 45岁)。计划进行一项随机临床试验。对照组患者接受传统旋转器械治疗;试验组患者接受超声骨手术工具治疗。根据计算机生成的随机列表,将26颗第三磨牙分配到试验组和对照组。所有手术操作均由同一位外科医生进行。在基线(手术前)以及术后第1天、第3天、第5天和第7天的随访中,评估疼痛、牙关紧闭、脸颊肿胀情况以及服用镇痛药的数量。

结果

与超声组相比,对照组的疼痛程度(采用视觉模拟评分法评估)更高;然而,未发现统计学上的显著差异。相反,试验组服用的镇痛药数量与对照组相比显著更低。与试验组相比,对照组牙关紧闭的发生率显著更高。在术后第5天的随访中,旋转组的脸颊肿胀临床值高于超声组。

结论

本研究表明,使用超声骨手术拔除第三磨牙可显著降低术后牙关紧闭的发生率、肿胀的发生率以及术后服用镇痛药的数量。

相似文献

1
A randomized clinical evaluation of ultrasound bone surgery versus traditional rotary instruments in lower third molar extraction.超声骨刀与传统旋转器械在下颌第三磨牙拔除术中的随机临床评估。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Feb;68(2):330-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.03.053. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
2
Effect of submucosal dexamethasone injection on postoperative pain, oedema, and trismus following mandibular third molar surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.下颌第三磨牙手术后黏膜下注射地塞米松对术后疼痛、水肿及牙关紧闭的影响:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲临床试验
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Apr;46(4):524-530. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
3
Effects of co-administered dexamethasone and nimesulide on pain, swelling, and trismus following third molar surgery: a randomized, triple-blind, controlled clinical trial.联合使用地塞米松和尼美舒利对第三磨牙手术后疼痛、肿胀和牙关紧闭的影响:一项随机、三盲、对照临床试验。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Feb;46(2):236-242. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.10.011. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
4
Perioperative bromelain reduces pain and swelling and improves quality of life measures after mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.围手术期使用菠萝蛋白酶可减轻下颌第三磨牙手术后的疼痛和肿胀,并改善生活质量指标:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jun;72(6):1043-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.12.035. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
5
Efficacy of a single dose of low-level laser therapy in reducing pain, swelling, and trismus following third molar extraction surgery.单次低强度激光治疗对减轻第三磨牙拔除术后疼痛、肿胀和牙关紧闭的疗效。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Mar;45(3):392-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.10.023. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
6
Effect of the proteolytic enzyme serrapeptase on swelling, pain and trismus after surgical extraction of mandibular third molars.蛋白水解酶舍雷肽酶对下颌第三磨牙手术拔除后肿胀、疼痛和牙关紧闭的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Mar;37(3):264-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.11.011. Epub 2008 Feb 12.
7
Assessment of combined local anesthesia and ketamine for pain, swelling, and trismus after surgical extraction of third molars.评估局部麻醉与氯胺酮联合使用对第三磨牙手术拔除后疼痛、肿胀和牙关紧闭的影响。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Jun;67(6):1206-10. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.12.034.
8
Efficacy of hyaluronic acid spray on swelling, pain, and trismus after surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.透明质酸喷雾对下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术后肿胀、疼痛和牙关紧闭的疗效。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Nov;43(11):1399-403. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
9
Comparative Study of Piezoelectric and Rotary Osteotomy Technique for Third Molar Impaction.第三磨牙阻生的压电与旋转截骨技术对比研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Jan 1;18(1):60-64. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1990.
10
Comparative study of the effect of a tube drain in impacted lower third molar surgery.下颌阻生第三磨牙手术中引流管效果的对比研究
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Jan;62(1):57-61. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(03)00675-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of patient comfort and satisfaction after the surgical removal of mandibular impacted molars using a piezo-electric technique: A randomized double-blind clinical trial.使用压电技术拔除下颌阻生磨牙后患者舒适度和满意度的评估:一项随机双盲临床试验。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025 Jan-Feb;15(1):108-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.12.009. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
2
Piezosurgery in Third Molar Extractions: A Systematic Review.第三磨牙拔除术中的压电外科手术:一项系统评价
J Pers Med. 2024 Dec 19;14(12):1158. doi: 10.3390/jpm14121158.
3
Comparison of Piezosurgery Devices and the Use of Rotatory Devices for the Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.
压电手术设备与旋转设备在下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除中的比较。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2140-S2142. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_92_24. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
4
A comparative analysis of postoperative morbidity and alveolar bone regeneration following surgical extraction of ımpacted lower third molar teeth using piezosurgery and conventional ınstruments: a split-mouth clinical ınvestigation.超声骨刀与传统器械在下颌第三磨牙阻生齿拔除术中术后并发症及牙槽骨再生的对比分析:一项随机对照临床研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Sep 14;29(1):460. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02051-8.
5
A novel concentrated growth factor (CGF) and bio-oss based strategy for second molar protection after impacted mandibular third molar extraction: a randomized controlled clinical study.一种新型浓缩生长因子(CGF)和生物骨基于策略用于下颌第三磨牙阻生拔除后第二磨牙的保护:一项随机对照临床研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Oct 12;23(1):750. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03411-2.
6
Comparative and clinical evaluation between piezoelectric and conventional rotary techniques for mandibular impacted third molar extraction.压电技术与传统旋转技术在下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除中的对比及临床评估
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2023 May-Aug;14(2):208-212. doi: 10.4103/njms.njms_333_21. Epub 2022 May 26.
7
Bilateral Inverted and Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Rare Case Report.双侧倒置阻生下颌第三磨牙:一例罕见病例报告。
Cureus. 2023 Mar 23;15(3):e36573. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36573. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
Post-Operative Complications and Risk Predictors Related to the Avulsion of Lower Impacted Third Molars.低位阻生第三磨牙拔除术中并发症及其相关风险预测因素。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 9;59(3):534. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030534.
9
Effect of concentrated growth factor (CGF) on postoperative sequel of completely impacted lower third molar extraction: a randomized controlled clinical study.浓缩生长因子(CGF)对完全埋伏阻生下颌第三磨牙拔除术后并发症的影响:一项随机对照临床研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Aug 30;22(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02408-7.
10
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Piezo Versus Conventional Rotary Surgery for Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.一项比较超声骨刀与传统旋转手术拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙的前瞻性随机对照临床试验。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Jun 25;9(7):276. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9070276.