Suppr超能文献

用于类风湿性关节炎的NeuFlex和斯旺森掌指关节植入物:前瞻性随机对照临床试验。

NeuFlex and Swanson metacarpophalangeal implants for rheumatoid arthritis: prospective randomized, controlled clinical trial.

作者信息

Escott Benjamin G, Ronald Kara, Judd Maria G P, Bogoch Earl R

机构信息

Keenan Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Jan;35(1):44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.09.020.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare postoperative range of motion (ROM) and function in a randomized prospective trial of Swanson and NeuFlex metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint implants.

METHODS

A total of 33 patients who had rheumatoid arthritis underwent primary MCP arthroplasty of all 4 fingers in 40 hands; 20 received Swanson implants and 20 received NeuFlex implants. Exclusion criteria included diagnosis of other connective tissue disorders and previous MCP joint surgery. All participants followed the same postoperative rehabilitation protocol. The primary outcome measure was active MCP flexion. Secondary outcomes included active MCP extension, arc of motion, ulnar drift, function (Jamar grip strength and Sollerman hand function test), and the Michigan Hand Questionnaire. Patients were assessed preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Patients' mean age was 62.5 years (Swanson) and 58.1 years (NeuFlex) (p = .03). A total of 19 of 20 hands (Swanson) and 14 of 20 hands (NeuFlex) were from female patients. Preoperative active ROM was not significantly different. At follow-up, both groups demonstrated increased active extension and arc of motion (p < .001), reduced active flexion and improved ulnar deviation (p < .001), increased mean Sollerman and Michigan Hand Questionnaire domain scores (p < .001), and improved grip strength (p = .03). Active MCP flexion was significantly greater in all 4 digits of hands with NeuFlex implants compared with Swanson implants. The NeuFlex group demonstrated a greater total arc of motion in the little finger. Implant groups were not significantly different by individual digit for active MCP extension, ulnar drift, and composite flexion. Functional outcomes did not differ between groups. Patients with Swanson implants reported higher Michigan Hand Questionnaire scores in the function and aesthetics domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Both implant groups obtained satisfactory clinical improvement after MCP reconstruction of the hand. The NeuFlex group demonstrated superior ROM, whereas the Swanson group had better self-reported function and aesthetics, but not objectively measured function.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic I.

摘要

目的

在一项关于Swanson和NeuFlex掌指(MCP)关节植入物的随机前瞻性试验中,比较术后活动范围(ROM)和功能。

方法

共有33例类风湿性关节炎患者的40只手的所有4个手指接受了初次MCP关节成形术;20例接受Swanson植入物,20例接受NeuFlex植入物。排除标准包括诊断为其他结缔组织疾病和既往MCP关节手术史。所有参与者遵循相同的术后康复方案。主要结局指标是主动MCP屈曲。次要结局包括主动MCP伸展、活动弧度、尺侧偏移、功能(Jamar握力和Sollerman手功能测试)以及密歇根手问卷。在术前和术后12个月对患者进行评估。

结果

患者的平均年龄为62.5岁(Swanson组)和58.1岁(NeuFlex组)(p = 0.03)。20只手中的19只(Swanson组)和20只手中的14只(NeuFlex组)来自女性患者。术前主动ROM无显著差异。在随访时,两组均表现出主动伸展和活动弧度增加(p < 0.001),主动屈曲减少且尺侧偏斜改善(p < 0.001),平均Sollerman和密歇根手问卷领域得分增加(p < 0.001),握力改善(p = 0.03)。与Swanson植入物相比,NeuFlex植入物的手的所有4个手指的主动MCP屈曲明显更大。NeuFlex组在小指中表现出更大的总活动弧度。植入物组在主动MCP伸展、尺侧偏移和复合屈曲的单个手指方面无显著差异。两组之间的功能结局无差异。接受Swanson植入物的患者在功能和美学领域的密歇根手问卷得分更高。

结论

两个植入物组在手部MCP重建后均获得了满意的临床改善。NeuFlex组表现出更好的ROM,而Swanson组具有更好的自我报告功能和美学,但功能的客观测量无差异。

研究类型/证据水平:治疗性I级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验