Department of Medicine, Christchurch Cardioendocrine Research Group, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Dec 29;55(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.095.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)-guided therapy with those of intensive clinical management and with usual care (UC) on clinical outcomes in chronic symptomatic heart failure.
Initial trial results suggest titration of therapy guided by serial plasma B-type natriuretic peptide levels improves outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure, but the concept has not received widespread acceptance. Accordingly, we conducted a longer-term study comparing the effects of NT-proBNP-guided therapy with those of intensive clinical management and with UC of patients with heart failure.
Three hundred sixty-four patients admitted to a single hospital with heart failure were randomly allocated 1:1:1 (stratified by age) to therapy guided by NT-proBNP levels or by intensive clinical management, or according to UC. Treatment strategies were applied for 2 years with follow-up to 3 years.
One-year mortality was less in both the hormone- (9.1%) and clinically-guided (9.1%) groups compared with UC (18.9%; p = 0.03). Three-year mortality was selectively reduced in patients <or=75 years of age receiving hormone-guided treatment (15.5%) compared with their peers receiving either clinically managed treatment (30.9%; p = 0.048) or UC (31.3%; p = 0.021).
Intensive management of chronic heart failure improves 1-year mortality compared with UC. Compared with clinically guided treatment and UC, hormone-guided treatment selectively improves longer-term mortality in patients <or=75 years of age. (NT-proBNP-Assisted Treatment To Lessen Serial Cardiac Readmissions and Death [BATTLESCARRED]; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry 12605000735651).
本研究旨在比较 N 末端脑利钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)指导治疗与强化临床管理和常规护理(UC)对慢性有症状心力衰竭患者临床结局的影响。
最初的试验结果表明,根据连续血浆 B 型利钠肽水平调整治疗可改善慢性心力衰竭患者的结局,但这一概念尚未得到广泛认可。因此,我们进行了一项为期更长时间的研究,比较 NT-proBNP 指导治疗与强化临床管理和 UC 对心力衰竭患者的影响。
364 例因心力衰竭入住单一医院的患者按 1:1:1(按年龄分层)随机分配至 NT-proBNP 水平指导治疗组、强化临床管理组或 UC 组。治疗策略持续 2 年,随访 3 年。
激素组(9.1%)和临床指导组(9.1%)的 1 年死亡率均低于 UC 组(18.9%;p=0.03)。年龄≤75 岁的患者中,激素指导治疗组的 3 年死亡率明显低于接受临床管理治疗的患者(30.9%;p=0.048)和 UC 组(31.3%;p=0.021)。
与 UC 相比,强化管理慢性心力衰竭可降低 1 年死亡率。与临床指导治疗和 UC 相比,激素指导治疗可选择性降低年龄≤75 岁患者的长期死亡率。(NT-proBNP 辅助治疗减少心力衰竭患者再入院和死亡的发生率[BATTLESCARRED];澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心 12605000735651)。