Division of Cardiology, University of California, Irvine, California 92868-4080, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jan 19;55(3):173-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.062.
Over the last 15 years, the use of invasive coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory has demonstrated favorable outcomes for decision making in patients with intermediate single-vessel stenoses, complex bifurcation and ostial branch stenoses, multivessel coronary artery disease, and left main stenoses. A recent large multicenter study (FAME [FFR versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation]) found that a physiologically-guided approach was superior to the standard angiographically-guided approach for percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. This review addresses selected pertinent concepts and studies supporting the integration of coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory for optimal patient outcomes.
在过去的 15 年中,在导管实验室中使用有创冠状动脉生理学已为患有中度单支血管狭窄、复杂分叉和开口支血管狭窄、多支冠状动脉疾病和左主干狭窄的患者的决策提供了有利的结果。最近一项大型多中心研究(FAME [血流储备分数与多支血管评估的血管造影])发现,对于多支冠状动脉疾病患者,生理指导的方法优于标准的血管造影指导的经皮血运重建方法。本综述介绍了支持将冠状动脉生理学整合到导管实验室以实现最佳患者结果的相关概念和研究。