Kanou Kazuhiko, Hirata Tomoko, Terashi Genki, Umeyama Hideaki, Takeda-Shitaka Mayuko
School of Pharmacy, Kitasato University, 5-9-1 Shirokane, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8641, Japan.
Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 2010 Feb;58(2):180-90. doi: 10.1248/cpb.58.180.
Selecting the best quality model from a set of predicted structures is one of the most important aspects of protein structure prediction. We have developed model quality assessment programs that select high quality models which account for both the Calpha backbone and side-chain atom positions. The new methods are based on the consensus method with consideration of the side-chain environment of a protein structure and the secondary structure agreement. This Side-chain Environment Consensus (SEC) method is compared with the conventional consensus method, 3D-Jury (Ginalski K. et al., Bioinformatics, 19, 1015-1018 (2003)), which takes into account only the Calpha backbone atoms of the protein model. As the result, it was found that the SEC method selects the models with more accurate positioning of the side-chain atoms than the 3D-Jury method. When the SEC method was used in combination with the 3D-Jury method (3DJ+SEC), models were selected with improved quality both in the Calpha backbone and side-chain atom positions. Moreover, the CIRCLE (CCL) method (Terashi G. et al., Proteins, 69 (Suppl. 8), 98-107 (2007)) based on the 3D-1D profile score has been shown to select the best possible models that are the closest to the native structures from candidate models. Accordingly, the 3DJ+SEC+CCL method, in which CIRCLE is used after reducing the number of candidates by the 3DJ+SEC consensus method, was found to be very effective in selecting high quality models. Thus, the best method (the 3DJ+SEC+CCL method) includes the consensus approaches of the Calpha backbone and the side-chains, the secondary structure agreement and the 3D-1D profile score which corresponds to the free energy-like score in the residues of the protein model. In short, new algorithms are introduced in protein structure evaluation methods that are based on a side-chain consensus score. Additionally, in order to apply the 3DJ+SEC+CCL method and indicate the usefulness of this method, a model of human Cabin1, a protein associated with p53 function and cancer, is created using various internet modeling and alignment servers.
从一组预测结构中选择质量最佳的模型是蛋白质结构预测最重要的方面之一。我们开发了模型质量评估程序,用于选择高质量模型,这些模型兼顾了α-碳主链和侧链原子的位置。新方法基于一种共识方法,该方法考虑了蛋白质结构的侧链环境和二级结构一致性。将这种侧链环境共识(SEC)方法与传统的共识方法3D-Jury(吉纳尔斯基·K等人,《生物信息学》,19,1015 - 1018(2003))进行了比较,后者仅考虑蛋白质模型的α-碳主链原子。结果发现,SEC方法选择的模型中侧链原子的定位比3D-Jury方法更准确。当SEC方法与3D-Jury方法(3DJ + SEC)结合使用时,在α-碳主链和侧链原子位置方面都选择了质量更高的模型。此外,基于3D - 1D轮廓得分的CIRCLE(CCL)方法(寺地·G等人,《蛋白质》,69(增刊8),98 - 107(2007))已被证明能从候选模型中选择最接近天然结构的最佳可能模型。因此,发现通过3DJ + SEC共识方法减少候选模型数量后再使用CIRCLE的3DJ + SEC + CCL方法在选择高质量模型方面非常有效。这样,最佳方法(3DJ + SEC + CCL方法)包括α-碳主链和侧链的共识方法、二级结构一致性以及与蛋白质模型残基中类似自由能得分相对应的3D - 1D轮廓得分。简而言之,基于侧链共识得分的蛋白质结构评估方法中引入了新算法。此外,为了应用3DJ + SEC + CCL方法并表明该方法的实用性,使用各种互联网建模和比对服务器创建了与p53功能及癌症相关的人类Cabin1蛋白的模型。