Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v. v. i. and Center for Biomolecules and Complex Molecular Systems, Flemingovo nám. 2, 166 10 Praha 6, Czech Republic.
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2010 Feb 14;12(6):1369-78. doi: 10.1039/b919354e. Epub 2009 Dec 18.
Three- and four-body nonadditivities in the uracil tetramer (in DNA-like geometry) and the GC step (in crystal geometry) were investigated at various levels of the wave-function theory: HF, MP2, MP3, L-CCD, CCSD and CCSD(T). All of the calculations were performed using the 6-31G**(0.25,0.15) basis set, whereas the HF, MP2 and the MP3 nonadditivities were, for the sake of comparison, also determined with the much larger aug-cc-pVDZ basis set. The HF and MP2 levels do not provide reliable values for many-body terms, making it necessary to go beyond the MP2 level. The benchmark CCSD(T) three- and four-body nonadditivities are reasonably well reproduced at the MP3 level, and almost quantitative agreement is obtained (fortuitously) either on the L-CCD level or as an average of the MP3 and the CCSD results. Reliable values of many-body terms (especially their higher-order correlation contributions) are obtained already when the rather small 6-31G**(0.25,0.15) basis set is used. The four-body term is much smaller when compared to the three-body terms, but it is definitely not negligible, e.g. in the case of the GC step it represents about 16% of all of the three- and four-body terms. While investigating the geometry dependence of many-body terms for the GG step at the MP3/6-31G**(0.25,0.15) level, we found that it is necessary to include at least three-body terms in the determination of optimal geometry parameters.
三、四体非加和性在尿嘧啶四聚体(DNA 类似的几何形状)和 GC 步(晶体几何形状)中进行了研究,涉及不同水平的波函数理论:HF、MP2、MP3、L-CCD、CCSD 和 CCSD(T)。所有的计算都使用 6-31G**(0.25,0.15)基组进行,而 HF、MP2 和 MP3 的非加和性,为了比较,也用更大的 aug-cc-pVDZ 基组进行了确定。HF 和 MP2 水平不能为许多体项提供可靠的值,因此需要超越 MP2 水平。CCSD(T)三、四体非加和性的基准值在 MP3 水平上得到了很好的再现,并且在 L-CCD 水平上或作为 MP3 和 CCSD 结果的平均值,几乎可以得到定量的一致性(偶然)。当使用相当小的 6-31G**(0.25,0.15)基组时,已经可以得到许多体项(特别是它们的高阶相关贡献)的可靠值。与三体项相比,四体项要小得多,但它绝对不可忽略,例如在 GC 步中,它占三体项和四体项的约 16%。在 MP3/6-31G**(0.25,0.15)水平上研究 GG 步的许多体项的几何依赖性时,我们发现,在确定最佳几何参数时,有必要至少包括三体项。