Wildlife Biology Program, Department of Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences, College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA.
Ecology. 2009 Dec;90(12):3445-54. doi: 10.1890/08-2090.1.
Trade-offs between predation risk and forage fundamentally drive resource selection by animals. Among migratory ungulates, trade-offs can occur at large spatial scales through migration, which allows an "escape" from predation, but trade-offs can also occur at finer spatial scales. Previous authors suggest that ungulates will avoid predation risk at the largest scale, although few studies have examined multi-scale trade-offs to test for the relative benefits of risk avoidance across scales. Building on previously developed spatial models of forage and wolf predation risk, we tested for trade-offs at the broad landscape scale and at a finer, within-home-range scale for migratory and non-migratory resident elk (Cervus elaphus) during summer in the Canadian Rockies in Banff National Park (BNP) and adjacent Alberta, Canada. Migration reduced exposure to wolf predation risk by 70% relative to residents at the landscape scale; at the fine scale, migrants used areas that were, on average, 6% higher in forage digestibility. In contrast, by forgoing migration, resident elk were exposed to higher predation risk, but they reduced predation risk at fine scales to only 15% higher than migrants by using areas close to human activity, which wolves avoided. Thus, residents paid for trying to avoid predation risk with lower forage quality. Residents may have been able to compensate, however, by using areas of abundant forage close to human activity where they may have been able to forage more selectively while avoiding predation risk. Human activity effectively decoupled the positive correlation between high forage quality and wolf predation, providing an effective alternate strategy for residents, similar to recent findings in other systems. Although ungulates appear capable of balancing risk and forage at different spatial scales, risk avoidance at large landscape scales may be more effective in the absence of human-caused refugia from predation.
动物对捕食风险和饲料之间的权衡,从根本上决定了它们对资源的选择。在迁徙的有蹄类动物中,通过迁徙可以在大的空间尺度上产生权衡,从而“逃避”捕食,但也可以在更精细的空间尺度上产生权衡。之前的作者认为,有蹄类动物会在最大的尺度上避免捕食风险,尽管很少有研究通过检验跨尺度风险回避的相对收益来检验多尺度权衡。在之前开发的饲料和狼捕食风险的空间模型的基础上,我们检验了在加拿大班夫国家公园(Banff National Park,BNP)和毗邻的加拿大艾伯塔省夏季迁徙和非迁徙的居留麋鹿( Cervus elaphus )的大景观尺度和精细的家域尺度上的权衡。与居留者相比,迁徙将在景观尺度上接触狼捕食风险的可能性降低了 70%;在精细尺度上,迁徙者使用的饲料消化率平均高出 6%的地区。相比之下,居留者为了避免捕食风险而放弃迁徙,因此会接触到更高的捕食风险,但它们通过使用靠近人类活动的地区,将精细尺度上的捕食风险降低到仅比迁徙者高 15%,而狼则避开了这些地区。因此,居留者为了试图避免捕食风险而牺牲了较低的饲料质量。然而,居留者可能通过使用靠近人类活动的大量饲料地区来弥补,在这些地区,它们可能能够更有选择性地觅食,同时避免捕食风险。人类活动有效地分离了高饲料质量和狼捕食之间的正相关关系,为居留者提供了一种有效的替代策略,这与其他系统最近的发现相似。尽管有蹄类动物似乎能够在不同的空间尺度上平衡风险和饲料,但在没有人类造成的逃避捕食的避难所的情况下,在大的景观尺度上避免风险可能更为有效。