Goldberg Joshua F, Hebblewhite Mark, Bardsley John
Wildlife Biology Program, Department of Ecosystem and Conservation Science, College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, United States of America.
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 26;9(3):e91417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091417. eCollection 2014.
Refugia can affect predator-prey dynamics via movements between refuge and non-refuge areas. We examine the influence of a refuge on population dynamics in a large mammal predator-prey system. Wolves (Canis lupus) have recolonized much of their former range in North America, and as a result, ungulate prey have exploited refugia to reduce predation risk with unknown impacts on wolf-prey dynamics. We examined the influence of a refuge on elk (Cervus elaphus) and wolf population dynamics in Banff National Park. Elk occupy the Banff townsite with little predation, whereas elk in the adjoining Bow Valley experience higher wolf predation. The Banff refuge may influence Bow Valley predator-prey dynamics through source-sink movements. To test this hypothesis, we used 26 years of wolf and elk population counts and the Delayed Rejection Adaptive Metropolis Markov chain Monte Carlo method to fit five predator-prey models: 1) with no source-sink movements, 2) with elk density-dependent dispersal from the refuge to the non-refuge, 3) with elk predation risk avoidance movements from the non-refuge to the refuge, 4) with differential movement rates between refuge and non-refuge, and 5) with short-term, source-sink wolf movements. Model 1 provided the best fit of the data, as measured by Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). In the top model, Banff and Bow Valley elk had median growth rates of 0.08 and 0.03 (95% credibility intervals [CIs]: 0.027-0.186 and 0.001-0.143), respectively, Banff had a median carrying capacity of 630 elk (95% CI: 471.9-2676.9), Bow Valley elk had a median wolf encounter rate of 0.02 (95% CI: 0.013-0.030), and wolves had a median death rate of 0.23 (95% CI: 0.146-0.335) and a median conversion efficiency of 0.07 (95% CI: 0.031-0.124). We found little evidence for potential source-sink movements influencing the predator-prey dynamics of this system. This result suggests that the refuge was isolated from the non-refuge.
避难所可通过避难区与非避难区之间的移动来影响捕食者 - 猎物动态。我们研究了一个避难所在大型哺乳动物捕食者 - 猎物系统中对种群动态的影响。狼(Canis lupus)已重新在北美大部分其先前的分布范围内定居,因此,有蹄类猎物利用避难所来降低被捕食风险,但其对狼 - 猎物动态的影响尚不清楚。我们研究了一个避难所在班夫国家公园对麋鹿(Cervus elaphus)和狼种群动态的影响。麋鹿在班夫镇址被捕食的情况很少,而在相邻的弓谷中的麋鹿则面临更高的狼捕食风险。班夫避难所可能通过源 - 汇移动影响弓谷的捕食者 - 猎物动态。为了验证这一假设,我们使用了26年的狼和麋鹿种群数量数据,并采用延迟拒绝自适应 metropolis 马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗方法来拟合五个捕食者 - 猎物模型:1)无源 - 汇移动;2)麋鹿密度依赖的从避难所到非避难所的扩散;3)麋鹿因捕食风险而从非避难所到避难所的回避移动;4)避难所和非避难所之间不同的移动速率;5)短期的、源 - 汇狼移动。根据赤池信息准则(AIC)衡量,模型1对数据的拟合最佳。在最优模型中,班夫和弓谷的麋鹿中位增长率分别为0.08和0.03(95%可信区间[CIs]:0.027 - 0.186和0.001 - 0.143),班夫的麋鹿承载能力中位数为630头(95% CI:471.9 - 2676.9),弓谷的麋鹿与狼的相遇率中位数为0.02(95% CI:0.013 - 0.030),狼的死亡率中位数为0.23(95% CI:0.146 - 0.335),转化效率中位数为0.07(95% CI:0.031 - 0.124)。我们几乎没有发现潜在的源 - 汇移动影响该系统捕食者 - 猎物动态的证据。这一结果表明避难所与非避难所是隔离的。