U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center, P.O. 5614, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA.
Conserv Biol. 2010 Feb;24(1):29-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01406.x.
Temperatures in southwestern North America are projected to increase 3.5-4 degrees C over the next 60-90 years. This will precipitate ecological shifts as the ranges of species change in response to new climates. During this shift, rapid-colonizing species should increase, whereas slow-colonizing species will at first decrease, but eventually become reestablished in their new range. This successional process has been estimated to require from 100 to over 300 years in small areas, under a stable climate, with a nearby seed source. How much longer will it require on a continental scale, under a changing climate, without a nearby seed source? I considered this question through an examination of the response of fossil plant assemblages from the Grand Canyon, Arizona, to the most recent rapid warming of similar magnitude that occurred at the start of the Holocene, 11,700 years ago. At that time, temperatures in southwestern North America increased about 4 degrees C over less than a century. Grand Canyon plant species responded at different rates to this warming climate. Early-successional species rapidly increased, whereas late-successional species decreased. This shift persisted throughout the next 2700 years. I found two earlier, less-extreme species shifts following rapid warming events around 14,700 and 16,800 years ago. Late-successional species predominated only after 4000 years or more of relatively stable temperature. These results suggest the potential magnitude, duration, and nature of future ecological changes and have implications for conservation plans, especially those incorporating equilibrium assumptions or reconstituting past conditions. When these concepts are extended to include the most rapid early-successional colonizers, they imply that the recent increases in invasive exotics may be only the most noticeable part of a new resurgence of early-successional vegetation. Additionally, my results challenge the reliability of models of future vegetation and carbon balance that project conditions on the basis of assumptions of equilibrium within only a century.
未来 60-90 年,北美西南部的气温预计将上升 3.5-4°C。随着物种范围因新气候而变化,这将引发生态转变。在这种转变过程中,快速殖民的物种应该会增加,而缓慢殖民的物种最初会减少,但最终会在新的范围内重新建立。在稳定气候下,在附近有种子源的小区域中,这个演替过程估计需要 100 到 300 多年的时间。在气候变化和没有附近种子源的情况下,在大陆尺度上需要多长时间?我通过检查亚利桑那州大峡谷的化石植物组合对最近一次类似规模的快速变暖的反应来考虑这个问题,这次变暖发生在全新世开始时,即 11700 年前。当时,北美西南部的温度在不到一个世纪的时间内上升了约 4°C。大峡谷的植物物种对这种变暖的气候有不同的反应速度。早期成功的物种迅速增加,而晚期成功的物种减少。这种转变持续了接下来的 2700 年。我发现了两次更早、不太极端的物种转变,分别发生在大约 14700 年和 16800 年前的快速变暖事件之后。只有在 4000 年或更长时间相对稳定的温度之后,晚期成功的物种才占主导地位。这些结果表明了未来生态变化的潜在规模、持续时间和性质,并对保护计划产生了影响,特别是那些包含平衡假设或重建过去条件的计划。当这些概念扩展到包括最快速的早期成功殖民者时,它们意味着最近外来入侵物种的增加可能只是早期成功植被新复兴的最显著部分。此外,我的结果挑战了基于仅一个世纪内平衡假设来预测未来植被和碳平衡的模型的可靠性。