Central Union for the Welfare of the Aged, Helsinki, Finland.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Dec;57(12):2200-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02564.x.
To determine whether community care of people with dementia can be prolonged with a 2-year multicomponent intervention program and to analyze effects of the intervention on total usage and expenses of social and healthcare services.
Randomized controlled trial.
Community-dwelling couples with one spouse caring for the other spouse with dementia.
Couples with dementia (N=125) were allocated at random to the intervention (n=63) or control group (n=62).
Intervention couples were provided with a multicomponent intervention program with a family care coordinator, a geriatrician, support groups for caregivers, and individualized services.
Time from enrollment to institutionalization of spouses with dementia and use of services and service expenditure of couples.
At 1.6 years, a larger proportion in the control group than in the intervention group was in long-term institutional care (25.8% vs 11.1%, P=.03). At 2 years, the difference was no longer statistically significant. The 2-year adjusted hazard ratio for the intervention group was 0.53 (95% confidence interval (CI)=0.23-1.19, P=.12). Intervention led to reduction in use of community services and expenditures. The difference for the benefit of intervention group was -7,985 Euro (95% CI=-16,081 to -1,499, P=.03). When the intervention costs were included, the differences between the groups were not significant.
Although the intervention did not result in a significant difference in the need for institutional care after 2 years, individualizing services in collaboration with families may lead to reduction in use of and expenditures on municipal services.
通过一项为期 2 年的多组分干预计划,确定是否可以延长痴呆症患者的社区护理,并分析干预对社会和医疗保健服务总使用量和费用的影响。
随机对照试验。
社区居住的夫妻,一方配偶照顾另一方痴呆症患者。
125 对患有痴呆症的夫妇被随机分配到干预组(n=63)或对照组(n=62)。
干预组的夫妇获得了多组分干预计划,包括家庭护理协调员、老年病学家、照顾者支持小组和个性化服务。
从登记到配偶痴呆症患者入院和夫妇使用服务和服务支出的时间。
1.6 年后,对照组中比干预组有更多的人长期入住机构(25.8%比 11.1%,P=.03)。2 年后,差异不再具有统计学意义。干预组的 2 年调整后风险比为 0.53(95%置信区间(CI)=0.23-1.19,P=.12)。干预导致社区服务使用和支出减少。干预组的受益差异为-7985 欧元(95%CI=-16081 至-1499,P=.03)。当包括干预成本时,两组之间的差异没有统计学意义。
尽管干预在 2 年后对机构护理需求没有显著差异,但与家庭合作个性化服务可能会导致减少对市政服务的使用和支出。