Hirschman Karen B, McHugh Molly, Morgan Brianna
University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2023 Aug 6;9(3):e12391. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12391. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
High rates of hospital visits and readmissions are common among persons living with dementia, resulting in frequent transitions in care and care coordination. This paper identifies and evaluates existing measures of transitions and care coordination for persons living with dementia and their caregivers.
This integrative review builds off a prior review using a systematic search of online databases (PubMed, EBSCO, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Scopus) to identify records and locate reports (or articles) that use measures of care transitions and care coordination. Identified measures were compared to the Alzheimer's Association's Dementia Care Practice Recommendations to evaluate strengths and weaknesses of the measure in this population, such as if measures were person- and family-centered.
Seventy-one reports using measures of transitions in care and care coordination for persons living with dementia and their caregivers were identified. There were multiple measures identified in some reports. Three main areas of measures were classified into: identification of the population (3 measures, 8 reports), transitional care and care coordination delivery (14 measures, 17 reports), and transitional care and care coordination outcomes (e.g., health-care use, cost, and mortality; 17 measures, 60 reports). A strength of the three main areas of measures was that a portion of the measures were person- and family-centered. Variability in the operational definitions of some measures and time intensiveness of collecting the measure (e.g., number of items, the time it takes to complete the items) were common weaknesses.
Transitions and care coordination measures are varied across studies targeted at persons living with dementia and their caregivers. Existing measures focus heavily on outcomes, specifically health-care resource use, and cost, rather than the elements of transitional care or care coordination. Future measure development focused on care transitions and service coordination is needed.
痴呆症患者的住院就诊和再入院率很高,导致护理和护理协调频繁转变。本文识别并评估了针对痴呆症患者及其护理人员的现有护理转变和护理协调措施。
本整合性综述基于之前的综述,通过系统检索在线数据库(PubMed、EBSCO、CINAHL、PsycInfo和Scopus)来识别记录并查找使用护理转变和护理协调措施的报告(或文章)。将识别出的措施与阿尔茨海默病协会的痴呆症护理实践建议进行比较,以评估该措施在这一人群中的优势和劣势,例如措施是否以个人和家庭为中心。
识别出71篇使用针对痴呆症患者及其护理人员的护理转变和护理协调措施的报告。一些报告中识别出了多种措施。措施主要分为三个主要领域:人群识别(3项措施,8篇报告)、过渡性护理和护理协调提供(14项措施,17篇报告)以及过渡性护理和护理协调结果(如医疗保健使用、成本和死亡率;17项措施,60篇报告)。这三个主要领域措施的一个优势是部分措施以个人和家庭为中心。一些措施的操作定义存在差异以及收集措施的时间强度(如项目数量、完成项目所需时间)是常见的弱点。
针对痴呆症患者及其护理人员的研究中,护理转变和护理协调措施各不相同。现有措施主要侧重于结果,特别是医疗保健资源使用和成本,而非过渡性护理或护理协调的要素。未来需要针对护理转变和服务协调开展措施开发。