• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在随机对照试验中,包含安慰剂组是否会影响对活性抗抑郁药治疗的反应?汇总和荟萃分析的结果。

Does inclusion of a placebo arm influence response to active antidepressant treatment in randomized controlled trials? Results from pooled and meta-analyses.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;71(3):270-9. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08r04516blu. Epub 2010 Jan 26.

DOI:10.4088/JCP.08r04516blu
PMID:20122371
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the inclusion of a placebo arm and/or the number of active comparators in antidepressant trials influences the response rates of the active medication and/or placebo.

DATA SOURCES

Searches of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and pharmaceutical Web sites for published trials or trials conducted but unpublished between January 1996 and October 2007.

STUDY SELECTION

2,275 citations were reviewed, 285 studies were retrieved, and 90 were included in the analysis. Trials reporting response and/or remission rates in adult subjects treated with an antidepressant monotherapy for unipolar major depression were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

The primary investigator recorded the number of responders and/or remitters in the intent-to-treat population of each study arm or computed these numbers using the quoted rates.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Poisson regression analyses demonstrated that mean response rate for the active medication was higher in studies comparing 2 or more active medications without a placebo arm than in studies comparing 2 or more active medications with a placebo arm (65.4% vs 57.7%, P < .0001) or in studies comparing only 1 active medication with placebo (65.4% vs 51.7%, P = .0005). Mean response rate for placebo was significantly lower in studies comparing 1 rather than 2 or more active medications (34.3% vs 44.6%, P = .003). Mean remission rates followed a similar pattern. Meta-analysis confirmed results from the pooled analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that antidepressant response rates in randomized control trials may be influenced by the presence of a placebo arm and by the number of treatment arms and that placebo response rates may be influenced by the number of active treatment arms in a study.

摘要

目的

确定在抗抑郁试验中纳入安慰剂组和/或活性对照的数量是否会影响活性药物和/或安慰剂的反应率。

数据来源

在 1996 年 1 月至 2007 年 10 月期间,在 MEDLINE、PsycINFO 和制药网站上搜索已发表的试验或已进行但未发表的试验。

研究选择

共审查了 2275 条引文,检索到 285 项研究,其中 90 项被纳入分析。纳入了报告在单相重性抑郁成人患者中单用抗抑郁药治疗的反应和/或缓解率的试验。

数据提取

主要研究者记录了每个研究组的意向治疗人群中的应答者和/或缓解者的数量,或者使用引用的比率计算这些数字。

数据综合

泊松回归分析表明,在比较 2 种或更多种无安慰剂组的活性药物的研究中,活性药物的平均反应率高于比较 2 种或更多种有安慰剂组的活性药物的研究(65.4%对 57.7%,P<.0001)或比较仅 1 种活性药物与安慰剂的研究(65.4%对 51.7%,P=.0005)。在比较 1 种而不是 2 种或更多种活性药物的研究中,安慰剂的平均反应率明显较低(34.3%对 44.6%,P=.003)。平均缓解率也呈现出类似的模式。荟萃分析证实了汇总分析的结果。

结论

这些数据表明,随机对照试验中的抗抑郁反应率可能受到安慰剂组的存在以及治疗组数量的影响,而安慰剂反应率可能受到研究中活性治疗组数量的影响。

相似文献

1
Does inclusion of a placebo arm influence response to active antidepressant treatment in randomized controlled trials? Results from pooled and meta-analyses.在随机对照试验中,包含安慰剂组是否会影响对活性抗抑郁药治疗的反应?汇总和荟萃分析的结果。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;71(3):270-9. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08r04516blu. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
2
Does the presence of an open-label antidepressant treatment period influence study outcome in clinical trials examining augmentation/combination strategies in treatment partial responders/nonresponders with major depressive disorder?在针对治疗部分缓解/无反应的重性抑郁障碍患者的增效/联合策略的临床试验中,开放性抗抑郁治疗期的存在是否会影响研究结果?
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 May;73(5):676-83. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11r06978. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
3
Complementary and alternative medicine for major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of patient characteristics, placebo-response rates, and treatment outcomes relative to standard antidepressants.补充和替代医学治疗重度抑郁症:对患者特征、安慰剂反应率以及与标准抗抑郁药治疗结果的荟萃分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Jun;71(6):682-8. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10r05976blu.
4
Anxiety does not predict response to duloxetine in major depression: results of a pooled analysis of individual patient data from 11 placebo-controlled trials.焦虑并不能预测度洛西汀治疗重度抑郁症的疗效:来自 11 项安慰剂对照试验的个体患者数据汇总分析的结果。
Depress Anxiety. 2010;27(1):12-8. doi: 10.1002/da.20632.
5
Does the probability of receiving placebo influence clinical trial outcome? A meta-regression of double-blind, randomized clinical trials in MDD.接受安慰剂的概率会影响临床试验结果吗?对重度抑郁症双盲随机临床试验的meta回归分析
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009 Jan;19(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2008.08.009. Epub 2008 Sep 26.
6
Correlation between different levels of placebo response rate and clinical trial outcome in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis.安慰剂反应率不同水平与重度抑郁症临床试验结局的相关性:一项荟萃分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;73(10):1300-6. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11r07485.
7
Sponsorship, antidepressant dose, and outcome in major depressive disorder: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.赞助、抗抑郁药剂量与重度抑郁症结局:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;73(2):e277-87. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11r07204.
8
Desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/d in the treatment of major depressive disorder: an 8-week, phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial and a post hoc pooled analysis of three studies.度洛西汀50毫克/天和100毫克/天治疗重度抑郁症:一项为期8周的III期多中心随机双盲安慰剂对照平行组试验及三项研究的事后汇总分析。
Clin Ther. 2009 Jun;31 Pt 1:1405-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.07.006.
9
Meta-analysis of placebo rates in major depressive disorder trials.重度抑郁症试验中安慰剂率的荟萃分析。
Ann Pharmacother. 2003 Dec;37(12):1891-9. doi: 10.1345/aph.1D172.
10
Control group bias in randomized atypical antipsychotic medication trials for schizophrenia.精神分裂症随机非典型抗精神病药物试验中的对照组偏倚。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Sep;62(9):961-70. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.9.961.

引用本文的文献

1
Emerging Medications for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Review with Perspective on Mechanisms and Challenges.治疗抵抗性抑郁症的新兴药物:机制与挑战视角的综述
Brain Sci. 2025 Feb 6;15(2):161. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15020161.
2
Placebo and the law of identification.安慰剂与认同法则。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 6;15:1474558. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1474558. eCollection 2024.
3
Treatment effect and safety of seltorexant as monotherapy for patients with major depressive disorder: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
塞托雷生单药治疗重度抑郁症患者的疗效与安全性:一项随机、安慰剂对照临床试验
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;30(6):2427-2435. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02846-5. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
4
Uncertainty of treatment efficacy moderates placebo effects on reinforcement learning.治疗效果的不确定性调节了安慰剂对强化学习的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 22;14(1):14421. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64240-z.
5
Machine Learning and Pharmacogenomics at the Time of Precision Psychiatry.精准精神医学时代的机器学习与药物基因组学
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2023;21(12):2395-2408. doi: 10.2174/1570159X21666230808170123.
6
When does the placebo effect have an impact on network meta-analysis results?安慰剂效应何时会对网络荟萃分析结果产生影响?
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Mar 21;29(2):127-134. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112197.
7
Factors Related to Placebo Response in Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trials of Antidepressants in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-regression Analysis.抗抑郁药治疗儿童和青少年的随机、双盲临床试验中安慰剂反应的相关因素:一项荟萃回归分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2023 Jun;43(6):383-391. doi: 10.1007/s40261-023-01273-8. Epub 2023 May 24.
8
Efficacy and acceptability of next step treatment strategies in adults with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.治疗抵抗性重性抑郁障碍成人患者的下一步治疗策略的疗效和可接受性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 18;12(4):e056777. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056777.
9
Postmarketing safety surveillance data reveals protective effects of botulinum toxin injections against incident anxiety.上市后安全性监测数据显示肉毒毒素注射对新发焦虑具有保护作用。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 21;11(1):24173. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03713-x.
10
Rostral anterior cingulate network effective connectivity in depressed adolescents and associations with treatment response in a randomized controlled trial.抑郁青少年中额前扣带回网络有效连接与随机对照试验中治疗反应的相关性。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 May;47(6):1240-1248. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01214-z. Epub 2021 Nov 15.