Suppr超能文献

在随机对照试验中,包含安慰剂组是否会影响对活性抗抑郁药治疗的反应?汇总和荟萃分析的结果。

Does inclusion of a placebo arm influence response to active antidepressant treatment in randomized controlled trials? Results from pooled and meta-analyses.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;71(3):270-9. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08r04516blu. Epub 2010 Jan 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the inclusion of a placebo arm and/or the number of active comparators in antidepressant trials influences the response rates of the active medication and/or placebo.

DATA SOURCES

Searches of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and pharmaceutical Web sites for published trials or trials conducted but unpublished between January 1996 and October 2007.

STUDY SELECTION

2,275 citations were reviewed, 285 studies were retrieved, and 90 were included in the analysis. Trials reporting response and/or remission rates in adult subjects treated with an antidepressant monotherapy for unipolar major depression were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

The primary investigator recorded the number of responders and/or remitters in the intent-to-treat population of each study arm or computed these numbers using the quoted rates.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Poisson regression analyses demonstrated that mean response rate for the active medication was higher in studies comparing 2 or more active medications without a placebo arm than in studies comparing 2 or more active medications with a placebo arm (65.4% vs 57.7%, P < .0001) or in studies comparing only 1 active medication with placebo (65.4% vs 51.7%, P = .0005). Mean response rate for placebo was significantly lower in studies comparing 1 rather than 2 or more active medications (34.3% vs 44.6%, P = .003). Mean remission rates followed a similar pattern. Meta-analysis confirmed results from the pooled analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that antidepressant response rates in randomized control trials may be influenced by the presence of a placebo arm and by the number of treatment arms and that placebo response rates may be influenced by the number of active treatment arms in a study.

摘要

目的

确定在抗抑郁试验中纳入安慰剂组和/或活性对照的数量是否会影响活性药物和/或安慰剂的反应率。

数据来源

在 1996 年 1 月至 2007 年 10 月期间,在 MEDLINE、PsycINFO 和制药网站上搜索已发表的试验或已进行但未发表的试验。

研究选择

共审查了 2275 条引文,检索到 285 项研究,其中 90 项被纳入分析。纳入了报告在单相重性抑郁成人患者中单用抗抑郁药治疗的反应和/或缓解率的试验。

数据提取

主要研究者记录了每个研究组的意向治疗人群中的应答者和/或缓解者的数量,或者使用引用的比率计算这些数字。

数据综合

泊松回归分析表明,在比较 2 种或更多种无安慰剂组的活性药物的研究中,活性药物的平均反应率高于比较 2 种或更多种有安慰剂组的活性药物的研究(65.4%对 57.7%,P<.0001)或比较仅 1 种活性药物与安慰剂的研究(65.4%对 51.7%,P=.0005)。在比较 1 种而不是 2 种或更多种活性药物的研究中,安慰剂的平均反应率明显较低(34.3%对 44.6%,P=.003)。平均缓解率也呈现出类似的模式。荟萃分析证实了汇总分析的结果。

结论

这些数据表明,随机对照试验中的抗抑郁反应率可能受到安慰剂组的存在以及治疗组数量的影响,而安慰剂反应率可能受到研究中活性治疗组数量的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验