Suppr超能文献

声诱发反应对声节拍和双耳节拍的比较。

A comparison of auditory evoked potentials to acoustic beats and to binaural beats.

机构信息

Evoked Potentials Laboratory, Behavioral Biology, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel.

出版信息

Hear Res. 2010 Apr;262(1-2):34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.01.013. Epub 2010 Feb 1.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare cortical brain responses evoked by amplitude modulated acoustic beats of 3 and 6 Hz in tones of 250 and 1000 Hz with those evoked by their binaural beats counterparts in unmodulated tones to indicate whether the cortical processes involved differ. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded to 3- and 6-Hz acoustic and binaural beats in 2000 ms duration 250 and 1000 Hz tones presented with approximately 1 s intervals. Latency, amplitude and source current density estimates of ERP components to beats-evoked oscillations were determined and compared across beat types, beat frequencies and base (carrier) frequencies. All stimuli evoked tone-onset components followed by oscillations corresponding to the beat frequency, and a subsequent tone-offset complex. Beats-evoked oscillations were higher in amplitude in response to acoustic than to binaural beats, to 250 than to 1000 Hz base frequency and to 3 Hz than to 6 Hz beat frequency. Sources of the beats-evoked oscillations across all stimulus conditions located mostly to left temporal lobe areas. Differences between estimated sources of potentials to acoustic and binaural beats were not significant. The perceptions of binaural beats involve cortical activity that is not different than acoustic beats in distribution and in the effects of beat- and base frequency, indicating similar cortical processing.

摘要

这项研究的目的是比较 3Hz 和 6Hz 调制声频拍与未调制声频拍在 250Hz 和 1000Hz 基频下诱发的皮质脑反应,以表明所涉及的皮质过程是否不同。通过记录 250Hz 和 1000Hz 声频在 2000ms 时长内,以大约 1s 的间隔呈现时,3Hz 和 6Hz 声频和双耳声频拍诱发的事件相关电位(ERP)。在不同的声频拍类型、声频拍频率和基频(载波)频率下,确定和比较了 ERP 成分对拍诱发振荡的潜伏期、振幅和源电流密度估计值。所有刺激都诱发了与拍频相对应的起始音成分后的振荡,以及随后的起始音消退复杂成分。与双耳声频拍相比,声频拍诱发的振荡在响应声频时的振幅更高,在响应 250Hz 基频时的振幅高于响应 1000Hz 基频时的振幅,在响应 3Hz 声频拍时的振幅高于响应 6Hz 声频拍时的振幅。在所有刺激条件下,拍诱发振荡的源主要位于左颞叶区域。到声频和双耳声频拍的电位估计源之间的差异并不显著。双耳声频拍的感知涉及到皮质活动,其分布和拍频及基频的影响与声频拍没有区别,表明了相似的皮质处理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验