Ann Epidemiol. 2010 Feb;20(2):89-91. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.12.001.
How to maximize creativity in biological science is a topic rarely discussed and yet critical to success in improving health. I believe that the needed approaches are not simply to flog individuals to try harder but to build systems and infrastructures that enhance creative effort. Lateral thinking can and should be taught. My hope for the future is that every graduate science curriculum will have a course in innovation. Institutions must provide time, space, and individual credit to the long and slow process of creative output. Highly multidisciplinary science should be supported, some of which may require seed or infrastructure support. Funders can separate idea generation from implementation. Scientists can minimize costs of failure by piloting and modeling ideas through incremental research, if supported by funders. But perhaps the very first step is to initiate a vibrant discussion of what we can do to enhance creativity in American biological science-it is time to stop complaining and to start winning the war on cancer.
如何在生物科学中最大限度地发挥创造力是一个很少被讨论但对提高健康水平至关重要的话题。我认为,所需的方法不仅仅是鞭策个人更加努力,而是建立系统和基础设施,以增强创造性努力。横向思维是可以而且应该被教授的。我对未来的希望是,每一个科学研究生课程都将有一门创新课程。机构必须为创造性产出的漫长而缓慢的过程提供时间、空间和个人信用。高度多学科的科学应该得到支持,其中一些可能需要种子或基础设施支持。资助者可以将创意的产生与实施分开。如果得到资助者的支持,科学家们可以通过渐进式研究来试点和模拟想法,从而将失败的成本降到最低。但也许第一步是启动一场关于我们可以采取哪些措施来提高美国生物科学创造力的热烈讨论——是时候停止抱怨,开始赢得抗癌战争了。