Department of Physics, SUPA, University of Strathclyde, , Glasgow G4 0NG, UK.
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2010 Mar 13;368(1914):927-39. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2009.0207.
It is 100 years since Minkowski and Abraham first gave rival expressions for the momentum of light in a material medium. At the single-photon level, these correspond, respectively, either to multiplying or dividing the free-space value (symbol:see text) by the refractive index (n). The debate that this work started has continued till the present day, punctuated by the occasional publication of 'decisive' experimental demonstrations supporting one or other of these values. We review the compelling arguments made in support of the Minkowski and Abraham forms and are led to the conclusion that both momenta are correct. We explain why two distinct momenta are needed to describe light in a medium and why each appears as the natural, and experimentally observed, momentum in appropriate situations.
自 Minkowski 和 Abraham 首次给出光在物质介质中的动量的两种相互竞争的表达式以来,已经过去了 100 年。在单光子水平上,这分别对应于将自由空间值(符号:see text)乘以或除以折射率(n)。这项工作引发的争论一直持续到今天,偶尔会有一些“决定性”的实验证明发表,支持这两种值中的一种。我们回顾了支持 Minkowski 和 Abraham 形式的有力论据,并得出结论,两种动量都是正确的。我们解释了为什么需要两种不同的动量来描述介质中的光,以及为什么每种动量在适当的情况下都是自然的,并且可以通过实验观察到。