• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Tubular discectomy resulted in greater leg and back pain and a lower rate of recovery than conventional microdiscectomy for sciatica.

作者信息

Anderson Paul A

机构信息

University of Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Feb;92(2):475. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.9202.ebo443.

DOI:10.2106/JBJS.9202.ebo443
PMID:20124079
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Tubular discectomy resulted in greater leg and back pain and a lower rate of recovery than conventional microdiscectomy for sciatica.对于坐骨神经痛，与传统的显微椎间盘切除术相比，管状椎间盘切除术导致更严重的腿部和背部疼痛以及更低的恢复率。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Feb;92(2):475. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.9202.ebo443.
2
Success of lumbar microdiscectomy in patients with modic changes and low-back pain: a prospective pilot study.腰椎间盘退变伴下腰痛患者行腰椎显微椎间盘切除术的疗效：一项前瞻性初步研究。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Apr;21(2):139-44. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318093e5dc.
3
Percutaneous laser disc decompression versus conventional microdiscectomy in sciatica: a randomized controlled trial.经皮激光椎间盘减压术与传统显微椎间盘切除术治疗坐骨神经痛的随机对照试验
Spine J. 2015 May 1;15(5):857-65. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.01.020. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
4
Tubular diskectomy vs conventional microdiskectomy for the treatment of lumbar disk herniation: 2-year results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.管状切除术与传统微创手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效比较：一项为期 2 年的双盲随机对照临床试验结果。
Neurosurgery. 2011 Jul;69(1):135-44; discussion 144. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318214a98c.
5
Effectiveness of microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a randomized controlled trial with 2 years of follow-up.显微椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的有效性：一项为期2年随访的随机对照试验
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Oct 1;31(21):2409-14. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000239178.08796.52.
6
Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy: surgical technique and preliminary results compared to microsurgical discectomy.经皮内镜下椎间盘切除术：手术技术及与显微外科椎间盘切除术相比的初步结果
J Neurosurg. 1993 Feb;78(2):216-25. doi: 10.3171/jns.1993.78.2.0216.
7
Sciatica management: chemonucleolysis vs. surgical discectomy.
Todays OR Nurse. 1991 Sep;13(9):18-23.
8
A meta-analysis of interlaminar minimally invasive discectomy compared to conventional microdiscectomy for lumbar disk herniation.一项关于层间微创椎间盘切除术与传统显微椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的荟萃分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 Dec;127:149-57. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
9
Comparison of postural control in unilateral stance between healthy controls and lumbar discectomy patients with and without pain.健康对照组与有疼痛和无疼痛的腰椎间盘切除术患者在单腿站立时姿势控制的比较。
Eur Spine J. 2006 Apr;15(4):423-32. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1013-4. Epub 2005 Aug 18.
10
Microdiscectomy with and without insertion of interspinous device for herniated disc at the L5-S1 level.L5-S1节段椎间盘突出症行或不行棘突间装置植入的显微椎间盘切除术。
J Clin Neurosci. 2014 Nov;21(11):1934-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.02.029. Epub 2014 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of outcomes between tubular microdiscectomy and conventional microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.管状显微切除术与传统显微切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效比较：系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jul 3;18(1):479. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03962-8.
2
Microdiscectomy or tubular discectomy: Is any of them a better option for management of lumbar disc prolapse.显微椎间盘切除术或管状椎间盘切除术：它们中的任何一种对于腰椎间盘突出症的治疗都是更好的选择吗？
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2016 Jul-Sep;7(3):146-52. doi: 10.4103/0974-8237.188411.
3
The efficacy of minimally invasive discectomy compared with open discectomy: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.
微创手术与开放手术治疗椎间盘突出症的疗效比较：前瞻性随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 May;16(5):452-62. doi: 10.3171/2012.1.SPINE11404. Epub 2012 Mar 9.