Suppr超能文献

打开紧闭的大门:支持临终关怀开放获取的论据。

Unlocking the closed door: arguments for open access hospice.

作者信息

Furman Christian Davis, Doukas David John, Reichel William

机构信息

University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky 40202, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2010 Feb;27(1):86-90. doi: 10.1177/1049909109338388.

Abstract

The traditional view of standard hospice (SH) care is that once begun, the doorway toward curative and other forms of nonpalliative treatment is irrevocably locked. We will argue that such a traditional view needs to be reassessed in light of new arguments and data regarding access to these avenues of treatment. We will argue that patients should be supported in their transition from SH to open access hospice (OAH). Open access hospice should be available to all patients because of ethical arguments, patient satisfaction arguments, and costs of care arguments. More randomized controlled research trials need to be performed to study the impact of OAH versus SH. This research should focus on patient satisfaction, cost, and survival.

摘要

传统的标准临终关怀(SH)护理观点认为,一旦开始,通往治愈性治疗和其他非姑息性治疗的大门就会不可逆转地关闭。我们将论证,鉴于有关获得这些治疗途径的新论据和数据,这种传统观点需要重新评估。我们将论证,应支持患者从SH向开放式临终关怀(OAH)过渡。出于伦理考量、患者满意度考量和护理成本考量,开放式临终关怀应面向所有患者。需要进行更多随机对照研究试验,以研究OAH与SH的影响。这项研究应关注患者满意度、成本和生存率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验