Baber Usman, Akhter Mohammed, Kothari Sharad, Sharma Samin K, Kini Annapoorna
Mount Sinai Hospital School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Feb;22(2):80-3.
The optimal combination of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting (PCI-S) among patients requiring oral anticoagulation (OAC) is unknown.
We sought to compare the efficacy of a modified dual-antiplatelet regimen (daily aspirin and every other day clopidogrel) to conventional treatment (daily aspirin and daily clopidogrel) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) among patients who are also discharged on warfarin.
We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of consecutive patients (n = 454) who underwent PCI-S with DES and were discharged on warfarin and either a conventional (n = 170) or modified (n = 284) antiplatelet regimen between March 2003 and May 2007. In-hospital and 1-year events were compared between the two groups.
There were no differences in 1-year rates of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis or target lesion revascularization between patients receiving a conventional compared to a modified antiplatelet regimen. In-hospital bleeding rates were also similar between the two groups.
An antiplatelet regimen of aspirin with every-other-day clopidogrel may be as efficacious as daily aspirin and clopidogrel among patients receiving warfarin following PCI-S with DES.
在需要口服抗凝治疗(OAC)的患者中,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并植入支架(PCI-S)后抗凝和抗血小板治疗的最佳组合尚不清楚。
我们旨在比较在接受药物洗脱支架(DES)的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后,改良双联抗血小板方案(每日服用阿司匹林,隔日服用氯吡格雷)与传统治疗方案(每日服用阿司匹林和氯吡格雷)在同时接受华法林治疗的患者中的疗效。
我们对2003年3月至2007年5月期间连续接受PCI-S并植入DES且出院时接受华法林治疗以及传统(n = 170)或改良(n = 284)抗血小板方案的患者(n = 454)进行了单中心回顾性分析。比较两组的住院期间和1年事件。
接受传统抗血小板方案与改良抗血小板方案的患者在1年死亡率、心肌梗死、支架血栓形成或靶病变血运重建率方面没有差异。两组的住院期间出血率也相似。
在接受DES的PCI-S后接受华法林治疗的患者中,阿司匹林与隔日氯吡格雷的抗血小板方案可能与每日阿司匹林和氯吡格雷一样有效。