Phys Med Biol. 2010 Feb 21;55(4):L5-8. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/4/L01. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
A recent electrostimulation study with human subjects (Recoskie et al 2009 Phys. Med. Biol. 54 5965-79) reported a large difference between chronaxie times when stimuli were delivered to the same body locus (the wrist) either through contact electrodes (electric stimulation) or through a pulsed magnetic field (magnetic stimulation). This paper reviews the procedures and analytic methods used in that study that might account for the reported discrepancies. Factors possibly accounting for reported discrepancies include the maximum and minimum pulse widths of the experimental stimuli; variations in experimental waveforms vis-à-vis mathematically ideal functions; differences in the spatial distribution of the in situ electric field for the two methods of delivery and differences in derived chronaxie relative to strength-duration time constants.
最近一项针对人类受试者的电刺激研究(Recoskie 等人,2009 年《物理医学与生物学》54 卷 5965-79 页)报告称,当刺激通过接触电极(电刺激)或脉冲磁场(磁刺激)施加到同一身体部位(手腕)时,时程存在很大差异。本文回顾了该研究中使用的程序和分析方法,这些方法可能解释了报告的差异。可能导致报告差异的因素包括实验刺激的最大和最小脉冲宽度;实验波形相对于数学理想函数的变化;两种传输方法的原位电场空间分布差异以及相对于强度-持续时间常数的衍生时程差异。