• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸部放射学中的多束均衡射线照相术。图像质量与辐射剂量考量

Multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology. Image quality and radiation dose considerations.

作者信息

Axelsson B, Forsberg H, Hansson B, Haverling M

机构信息

Department of Hospital Physics, Karolinska Sjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Radiol. 1991 Jan;32(1):12-7.

PMID:2012722
Abstract

The large difference in transmission between the mediastinum and the part of the chest mainly containing lungs causes major problems in chest radiography. A system for advanced multiple beam equalization radiography has been evaluated. Evaluation of image quality has been performed both using standard phantoms and from clinical radiographs. Measurements of radiation dose burden to the patient have been made both in clinical examinations and using an anthropomorphic phantom. The image quality, in areas with low transmission, is substantially increased using the equalization system. In parts of the chest mainly containing lung tissue, conventional systems show an equal or slightly better image quality. The radiation dose burden to the patient is increased by 25 percent using the equalization system, as compared to a low-dose air-gap system. In our opinion, the slight increase in radiation dose burden is well motivated by the high overall quality of the radiographs produced.

摘要

纵隔与胸部主要包含肺部的部分之间在透射方面的巨大差异给胸部X线摄影带来了重大问题。一种先进的多束均衡射线摄影系统已得到评估。已使用标准体模并从临床X线照片对图像质量进行了评估。已在临床检查中并使用拟人化体模对患者的辐射剂量负担进行了测量。使用均衡系统时,低透射区域的图像质量大幅提高。在胸部主要包含肺组织的部分,传统系统显示出相同或略好的图像质量。与低剂量气隙系统相比,使用均衡系统时患者的辐射剂量负担增加了25%。我们认为,所产生的X线照片总体质量较高,因此辐射剂量负担的轻微增加是完全合理的。

相似文献

1
Multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology. Image quality and radiation dose considerations.胸部放射学中的多束均衡射线照相术。图像质量与辐射剂量考量
Acta Radiol. 1991 Jan;32(1):12-7.
2
AMBER and conventional chest radiography: comparison of radiation dose and image quality.AMBER与传统胸部X线摄影:辐射剂量与图像质量的比较。
Radiology. 1992 Dec;185(3):719-23. doi: 10.1148/radiology.185.3.1438752.
3
Filter wheel equalization in chest radiography: demonstration with a prototype system.胸部X线摄影中的滤光轮均衡:用原型系统进行演示
Radiology. 1995 Sep;196(3):845-50. doi: 10.1148/radiology.196.3.7644654.
4
Advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology: a simulated nodule detection study.胸部放射学中的先进多束均衡射线照相术:一项模拟结节检测研究。
Radiology. 1988 Oct;169(1):35-9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.169.1.3420280.
5
Improved pulmonary nodule detection with scanning equalization radiography.采用扫描均衡射线照相术提高肺结节检测率。
Radiology. 1988 Oct;169(1):23-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.169.1.3420264.
6
Area beam equalization: optimization and performance of an automated prototype system for chest radiography.
Acad Radiol. 2004 Apr;11(4):377-89. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)00730-x.
7
Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.胸部成像患者的剂量降低:数字非晶硅平板探测器X线摄影与传统屏-片X线摄影及磷光体计算机X线摄影的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Oct;181(4):923-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.181.4.1810923.
8
Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.减少照射剂量对计算机X线摄影的影响:胸部体模的结节检测准确性与传统及非对称屏-片X线摄影的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Aug;165(2):269-73. doi: 10.2214/ajr.165.2.7618538.
9
A phantom for dose-image quality optimization in chest radiography.用于胸部X线摄影剂量-图像质量优化的体模。
Br J Radiol. 2002 Oct;75(898):837-42. doi: 10.1259/bjr.75.898.750837.
10
AMBER: a scanning multiple-beam equalization system for chest radiography.AMBER:一种用于胸部X光摄影的扫描多束均衡系统。
Radiology. 1988 Oct;169(1):29-34. doi: 10.1148/radiology.169.1.3420279.