Suppr超能文献

[从重症医学角度看2003 - 2010年德国疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)系统]

[The German DRG system 2003-2010 from the perspective of intensive care medicine].

作者信息

Franz Dominik, Bunzemeier Holger, Roeder Norbert, Reinecke Holger

机构信息

DRG-Research-Group, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Med Klin (Munich). 2010 Jan;105(1):13-9. doi: 10.1007/s00063-010-1002-1. Epub 2010 Feb 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intensive care medicine is extremely heterogeneous, expensive and can only be partially planned and controlled. A correct and fair representation of intensive care medicine in the G-DRG system is an essential requirement for the use as a pricing system. From the perspective of intensive care medicine, pertinent changes of the DRG structure and differentiation of relevant parameters have been established within the G-DRG systems 2003-2010.

METHODS

Analysis of relevant diagnoses, medical procedures, co-payment structures and G-DRGs in the versions 2003-2010 based on the publications of the German DRG Institute (InEK) and the German Institute of Medical Documentation and Information (DIMDI).

RESULTS

Since the first G-DRG system version 2003, numerous measures improved quality of case allocation of intensive care medicine. Highly relevant to the system version 2010 are duration of mechanical ventilation, the intensive care treatment complex and complicating constellations. The number of G-DRGs relevant to intensive medical care increased from n = 3 (2003) to n = 58 (2010).

CONCLUSION

For standard cases, quality of case allocation and G-DRG reimbursement are adequate in 2010. The G-DRG system gained complexity again. High demands are made on correct and complete coding of complex cases. Nevertheless, further adjustments of the G-DRG system especially for cases with extremely high costs are necessary. Where the G-DRG system is unable to cover extremely high-cost cases, reimbursement solutions beyond the G-DRG structure should be taken into account.

摘要

背景

重症监护医学极为复杂多样,成本高昂,且只能部分进行规划和控制。在G-DRG系统中正确且公平地体现重症监护医学是其作为定价系统使用的基本要求。从重症监护医学的角度来看,2003 - 2010年的G-DRG系统内已对DRG结构进行了相关调整,并对相关参数进行了区分。

方法

基于德国DRG研究所(InEK)和德国医学文献与信息研究所(DIMDI)的出版物,对2003 - 2010年版本中的相关诊断、医疗程序、共付结构和G-DRG进行分析。

结果

自2003年首个G-DRG系统版本以来,众多措施提高了重症监护医学病例分配的质量。与2010年系统版本高度相关的因素有机械通气时长、重症监护治疗组合及并发情况。与重症医疗相关的G-DRG数量从2003年的n = 3增加到2010年的n = 58。

结论

对于标准病例,2010年病例分配质量和G-DRG报销情况是合适的。G-DRG系统再次变得复杂。对复杂病例的正确且完整编码提出了很高要求。然而,仍有必要对G-DRG系统进行进一步调整,尤其是针对成本极高的病例。在G-DRG系统无法涵盖成本极高病例的情况下,应考虑G-DRG结构之外的报销解决方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验