Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712, USA.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010 Mar;16(2):352-9. doi: 10.1017/S1355617709991408. Epub 2010 Feb 3.
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST; Heaton, 1980) is commonly used to assess concept formation and set shifting. Cognitive research suggests that set shifting performance is enhanced by a match between a person's regulatory focus (promotion focus: attempting to earn an entry into a cash drawing; prevention focus: attempting to avoid losing an entry into the drawing) and the task reward structure (gains: attempting to maximize points gained; losses: attempting to minimize points lost). A regulatory match results when attempting to earn an entry by maximizing points or attempting to avoid losing an entry by minimizing losses. We test the hypothesis that performance on a modified WCST is accentuated in younger, healthy participants when there is a match between the global performance incentive and the local task reward structure. As predicted, participants in a match showed better set shifting but equivalent initial concept formation when compared with participants in a mismatch. Furthermore, relative to a baseline control group, mismatch participants were significantly worse at set shifting than were participants in a regulatory match. These results suggest that set shifting performance might be impacted by incentive and task reward factors in ways that have not been considered previously.
威斯康星卡片分类任务(WCST;Heaton,1980)常用于评估概念形成和转换。认知研究表明,当一个人的调节焦点(促进焦点:试图赢得进入现金抽奖的机会;预防焦点:试图避免失去进入抽奖的机会)与任务奖励结构(收益:试图最大化获得的分数;损失:试图最小化失去的分数)相匹配时,转换性能会得到提高。当试图通过最大化分数来赢得一个条目,或者试图通过最小化损失来避免失去一个条目时,就会出现调节匹配。我们假设,当全局绩效激励与局部任务奖励结构相匹配时,在年轻、健康的参与者中,对改良版 WCST 的表现会更加突出。正如预测的那样,与不匹配的参与者相比,匹配的参与者在转换上表现更好,但在初始概念形成上表现相当。此外,与基线对照组相比,不匹配的参与者在转换上的表现明显不如调节匹配的参与者。这些结果表明,转换性能可能会受到激励和任务奖励因素的影响,而这些因素以前没有被考虑过。