• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于参考标准的放射学质量保证计划。

A reference standard-based quality assurance program for radiology.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Radiol. 2010 Jan;7(1):61-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.08.016.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacr.2009.08.016
PMID:20129274
Abstract

The authors have developed a comprehensive radiology quality assurance (QA) program that evaluates radiology interpretations and procedures by comparing them with reference standards. Performance metrics are calculated and then compared with benchmarks or goals on the basis of published multicenter data and meta-analyses. Additional workload for physicians is kept to a minimum by having trained allied health staff members perform the comparisons of radiology reports with the reference standards. The performance metrics tracked by the QA program include the accuracy of CT colonography for detecting polyps, the false-negative rate for mammographic detection of breast cancer, the accuracy of CT angiography detection of coronary artery stenosis, the accuracy of meniscal tear detection on MRI, the accuracy of carotid artery stenosis detection on MR angiography, the accuracy of parathyroid adenoma detection by parathyroid scintigraphy, the success rate for obtaining cortical tissue on ultrasound-guided core biopsies of pelvic renal transplants, and the technical success rate for peripheral arterial angioplasty procedures. In contrast with peer-review programs, this reference standard-based QA program minimizes the possibilities of reviewer bias and erroneous second reviewer interpretations. The more objective assessment of performance afforded by the QA program will provide data that can easily be used for education and management conferences, research projects, and multicenter evaluations. Additionally, such performance data could be used by radiology departments to demonstrate their value over nonradiology competitors to referring clinicians, hospitals, patients, and third-party payers.

摘要

作者开发了一个全面的放射学质量保证 (QA) 计划,通过将放射学解释和程序与参考标准进行比较来评估其质量。根据发表的多中心数据和荟萃分析,计算出绩效指标,并与基准或目标进行比较。通过培训的辅助卫生人员将放射学报告与参考标准进行比较,将医生的额外工作量降到最低。QA 计划跟踪的绩效指标包括 CT 结肠成像检测息肉的准确性、乳腺 X 线摄影检测乳腺癌的假阴性率、CT 血管造影检测冠状动脉狭窄的准确性、MRI 检测半月板撕裂的准确性、MR 血管造影检测颈动脉狭窄的准确性、甲状旁腺闪烁显像检测甲状旁腺腺瘤的准确性、超声引导下骨盆肾移植皮质组织芯活检的成功率,以及外周动脉血管成形术的技术成功率。与同行评审计划相比,这种基于参考标准的 QA 计划最大限度地减少了评审员偏见和错误的二次评审员解释的可能性。QA 计划提供的更客观的绩效评估将提供数据,这些数据可用于教育和管理会议、研究项目和多中心评估。此外,放射科部门可以使用这些绩效数据向参考临床医生、医院、患者和第三方支付者展示其相对于非放射科竞争对手的价值。

相似文献

1
A reference standard-based quality assurance program for radiology.基于参考标准的放射学质量保证计划。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2010 Jan;7(1):61-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.08.016.
2
Quality assurance for abdominal CT: a rapid, computer-assisted technique.腹部CT的质量保证:一种快速的计算机辅助技术。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Nov;167(5):1141-5. doi: 10.2214/ajr.167.5.8911167.
3
Quality--a radiology imperative: interpretation accuracy and pertinence.质量——放射学的关键要求:解读的准确性与相关性。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2007 Mar;4(3):162-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.09.020.
4
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
5
Quality assessment and improvement: what radiologists do and think.质量评估与改进:放射科医生的工作与思考
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Nov;163(5):1245-54. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.5.7976910.
6
Automating quality assurance for digital radiography.实现数字射线照相术的质量保证自动化。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2009 Jul;6(7):486-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.12.008.
7
Peer review in diagnostic radiology: current state and a vision for the future.诊断放射学中的同行评审:现状与未来展望。
Radiographics. 2009 Sep-Oct;29(5):1221-31. doi: 10.1148/rg.295095086. Epub 2009 Jun 29.
8
Performance-based assessment of radiology practitioners: promoting improvement in accordance with the 2007 joint commission standards.基于绩效的放射科医生评估:依据2007年联合委员会标准促进改进。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2007 Oct;4(10):699-703. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.05.007.
9
Defining quality in radiology.放射学中的质量定义。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2007 Apr;4(4):217-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.11.014.
10
Efficient quality assurance programs in radiology and nuclear medicine in Ostergotland, Sweden.瑞典东约特兰省放射学与核医学领域的高效质量保证项目。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010 Apr-May;139(1-3):410-7. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncq065. Epub 2010 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency radiology: roadmap for radiology departments.急诊放射学:放射科的路线图。
Jpn J Radiol. 2025 Jun 20. doi: 10.1007/s11604-025-01819-0.
2
Added value of double reading in diagnostic radiology,a systematic review.诊断放射学中双重读片的附加值:一项系统综述
Insights Imaging. 2018 Jun;9(3):287-301. doi: 10.1007/s13244-018-0599-0. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
3
A computer-assisted systematic quality monitoring method for cervical hip fracture radiography.一种用于髋部骨折颈椎X线摄影的计算机辅助系统质量监测方法。
Acta Radiol Open. 2016 Dec 5;5(12):2058460116674749. doi: 10.1177/2058460116674749. eCollection 2016 Dec.
4
Developing an automated database for monitoring ultrasound- and computed tomography-guided procedure complications and diagnostic yield.开发一个用于监测超声和计算机断层扫描引导下手术并发症及诊断率的自动化数据库。
J Digit Imaging. 2014 Apr;27(2):270-9. doi: 10.1007/s10278-013-9649-9.
5
Interrater variation in scoring radiological discrepancies.评分员在评估放射学差异方面的变异性。
Br J Radiol. 2013 Aug;86(1028):20130245. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130245. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
6
Unbiased review of digital diagnostic images in practice: informatics prototype and pilot study.实践中的数字诊断图像无偏评估:信息学原型和初步研究。
Acad Radiol. 2013 Feb;20(2):238-42. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.09.016. Epub 2012 Oct 26.