Monsénégo G, Burdairon G, Porte C, Naud C
Paris V.
Cah Prothese. 1991 Mar(73):85-91.
The experimental protocol developed in the previous article (4) has been modified to permit the investigation of the fluorescence of shade guides. The following will be traced out on each graphic display: a reference spectrum using full lines; a sample spectrum using dotted lines; the chromaticity triangle of the X Y Z CIE 1931 system; the chromaticity of the sample to be tested, represented by the sign +; the chromaticity of the reference, represented by the sign -. The shade guides without any rare earth have spectra in the form of wide bands; their intensity decreases when the degree of colour purity in white light of the buttons increases. The shade guides containing rare earth have spectra with both a wide band and thin lines. It has been shown that: the same shade guide can contain different fluorescence components; two shade guides from the same source can have very different fluorescences for buttons of the same reference; two shade guides from different sources can have identical fluorescent components. This study reveals: that unadapted fluorescences of shade guide may be the cause of an error in the choice of the colour of a ceramic restoration; that the comparison of spectra appears to prove that shade guides are not manufactured by the ceramic manufacturers which recommend them and are, in fact, of the same origin.
上一篇文章(4)中开发的实验方案已作修改,以便能够研究比色板的荧光。以下各项将在每个图形显示器上描绘出来:用实线表示的参考光谱;用虚线表示的样本光谱;CIE 1931 XYZ系统的色度三角形;用符号+表示的待测样本的色度;用符号-表示的参考样本的色度。不含任何稀土元素的比色板的光谱呈宽带状;当纽扣白光中的颜色纯度增加时,其强度会降低。含有稀土元素的比色板的光谱既有宽带又有细线。已经表明:同一比色板可能包含不同的荧光成分;来自同一来源的两个比色板对于相同参考的纽扣可能具有非常不同的荧光;来自不同来源的两个比色板可能具有相同的荧光成分。这项研究揭示:比色板未经调整的荧光可能是陶瓷修复体颜色选择错误的原因;光谱比较似乎证明,比色板并非由推荐它们的陶瓷制造商生产,实际上它们来源相同。