Suppr超能文献

医生诊断的过敏性鼻炎是否是哮喘发展的一个危险因素?

Is physician-diagnosed allergic rhinitis a risk factor for the development of asthma?

机构信息

Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Allergy. 2010 Aug;65(8):1049-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02316.x. Epub 2010 Feb 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is strong evidence that there is a relationship between allergic rhinitis (AR) and asthma, but it is unclear whether there is a causal relation between AR and asthma. The aim of this study was to assess prospectively whether AR is a risk factor for the diagnosis of asthma in a large primary care population.

METHODS

We performed a historic cohort study of life-time morbidity that had been recorded prospectively since 1967 in four general practices. Two groups of subjects were selected: (i) patients with diagnosis of AR, (ii) a control group matched using propensity scores. We assessed the risk of physician-diagnosed asthma in patients with physician-diagnosed AR compared to subjects without a diagnosis of AR (controls).

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 6491 subjects (n = 2081 patients with AR). Average study follow-up was 8.4 years. In patients with AR, the frequency of newly diagnosed asthma was 7.6% (n = 158) compared to 1.6% (n = 70) in controls (P < 0.001). After adjusting the effect of AR on asthma diagnosis for registration time, age, gender, eczema and socioeconomic status, having AR was a statistically significant risk factor for asthma (hazard ratio: 4.86, P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval: 3.50-6.73, controls as reference).

CONCLUSION

A diagnosis of AR was an independent risk factor for asthma in our primary care study population. Having physician-diagnosed AR increased the risk almost fivefold for a future asthma diagnosis.

摘要

背景

有强有力的证据表明变应性鼻炎(AR)和哮喘之间存在关联,但 AR 和哮喘之间是否存在因果关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在前瞻性评估在大型初级保健人群中 AR 是否是哮喘诊断的危险因素。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,对自 1967 年以来一直前瞻性记录的终生发病情况进行了研究。选择了两组受试者:(i)诊断为 AR 的患者,(ii)使用倾向评分匹配的对照组。我们评估了与未诊断为 AR(对照组)的患者相比,被诊断为 AR 的患者患医生诊断的哮喘的风险。

结果

研究人群包括 6491 名受试者(n = 2081 名 AR 患者)。平均研究随访时间为 8.4 年。在 AR 患者中,新诊断哮喘的频率为 7.6%(n = 158),而对照组为 1.6%(n = 70)(P < 0.001)。在调整 AR 对哮喘诊断的登记时间、年龄、性别、湿疹和社会经济状况的影响后,患有 AR 是哮喘的统计学显著危险因素(危险比:4.86,P < 0.001,95%置信区间:3.50-6.73,以对照组为参照)。

结论

在我们的初级保健研究人群中,AR 的诊断是哮喘的独立危险因素。有医生诊断的 AR 会使未来哮喘诊断的风险增加近五倍。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验