University of Michigan Hospitals and Health Centers (UMHHC), Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2010 Feb 15;67(4):295-9. doi: 10.2146/ajhp090101.
Drug costs and utilization after implementation of a posaconazole prophylaxis protocol in adults with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) were studied.
Adult patients who initiated induction or reinduction chemotherapy for the treatment of AML between December 1, 2006, and March 31, 2008, at a tertiary care hospital were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were divided into two groups: preprotocol (treated before June 1, 2007) and postprotocol (treated on or after June 1, 2007). Medical charts, including pharmacy and laboratory data, were reviewed for all patients. Outcomes measured included antifungal and antibacterial drug costs and utilization and total pharmacy costs.
A total of 66 patients were evaluated (33 in each group). Baseline characteristics, except patient age, were similar between groups. Each group incurred similar costs and utilized resources for similar periods of time as evidenced by similar lengths of stay, duration of neutropenia, and mortality. Antibacterial costs, total pharmacy costs, and other utilization outcomes were also similar between the two groups. Alterations to antifungal management strategy occurred more often in the postprotocol group (33% versus 58%, p = 0.048).
Implementation of a posaconazole protocol did not significantly alter antifungal or antibacterial drug costs or utilization or total pharmacy costs. Prophylactic posaconazole was frequently changed to alternative antifungal therapy due to an adverse drug event, perceived lack of efficacy, avoidance of a drug interaction, or inability to tolerate oral intake.
研究急性髓系白血病(AML)成人患者实施泊沙康唑预防方案后药物成本和利用情况。
本回顾性队列研究纳入了 2006 年 12 月 1 日至 2008 年 3 月 31 日期间在一家三级护理医院接受诱导或再诱导化疗治疗 AML 的成年患者。患者分为两组:方案前组(治疗于 2007 年 6 月 1 日之前)和方案后组(治疗于 2007 年 6 月 1 日或之后)。对所有患者的病历,包括药房和实验室数据进行了回顾。评估的结果包括抗真菌和抗菌药物的成本和利用情况以及总药房成本。
共评估了 66 例患者(每组 33 例)。除患者年龄外,两组的基线特征相似。两组的住院时间、中性粒细胞减少持续时间和死亡率相似,表明两组的成本和资源利用情况相似。两组的抗菌药物成本、总药房成本和其他利用结果也相似。方案后组改变抗真菌治疗策略的情况更为常见(33%与 58%,p = 0.048)。
实施泊沙康唑方案并未显著改变抗真菌或抗菌药物成本或利用情况或总药房成本。由于药物不良反应、疗效不佳、避免药物相互作用或无法耐受口服摄入,预防性泊沙康唑经常更改为其他抗真菌治疗。