Paraschou Stamatios, Bekir Huseyin, Anastasopoulos Helias, Papapanos Athanasios, Alexopoulos John, Karanikolas Anestis, Roussis Nick
Department of Orthopedics, Kilkis General Hospital, Agrinio, Greece.
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2009;43(6):472-7. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2009.472.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of interlocking intramedullary nailing in the treatment of extra-articular distal tibial fractures and nonunions.
The study included 45 patients (mean age 42 years; range 27 to 52 years) who were treated with interlocking intramedullary nailing for distal tibial fractures (n=35) and nonunions (n=10). Of 35 fractures, 31 were closed and four were open. The fractures were AO A1 (n=27), A2 (n=6), and A3 (n=2). In addition, two patients had medial, and 14 patients had lateral malleolus fractures. A Gross-Kempf (Howmedica) nail was used in 38 patients and an Expert nail (Synthes) was used in seven patients. Dynamic nailing was performed in 22 patients and static nailing was performed in 23 patients. No grafting was used. The patients were assessed clinically and radiographically within a mean follow-up period of 37 months (range 24 to 60 months).
Union was achieved in all the patients within a mean of 4.6 months (range 3 to 7 months). Dynamization was required in three patients. The mean time to union was 4.4 months (range 3 to 6 months) with dynamic nailing and 4.8 months (range 3 to 7 months) with static nailing. Complications were not serious. Transient peroneal nerve palsy developed in one patient (2.2%). Knee pain was seen in four patients (8.9%) due to the protrusion of the nail and it disappeared after removal of the nail. Five patients (11.1%) had limitation of ankle movements in a range of 5 to 10 degrees. None of the patients had restriction in knee motion.
Intramedullary interlocking nailing is a reliable method of treatment for distal tibial fractures and nonunions, with a high rate of union and low complication rate.
本研究旨在评估交锁髓内钉治疗胫骨远端关节外骨折及骨不连的效果。
本研究纳入45例患者(平均年龄42岁;范围27至52岁),其中35例胫骨远端骨折患者及10例骨不连患者接受了交锁髓内钉治疗。35例骨折患者中,31例为闭合性骨折,4例为开放性骨折。骨折类型为AO A1型(27例)、A2型(6例)和A3型(2例)。此外,2例患者合并内踝骨折,14例患者合并外踝骨折。38例患者使用Gross-Kempf(豪美迪卡)髓内钉,7例患者使用Expert髓内钉(辛迪斯)。22例患者采用动力化髓内钉固定,23例患者采用静力化髓内钉固定。均未使用植骨。在平均37个月(范围24至60个月)的随访期内对患者进行临床及影像学评估。
所有患者均在平均4.6个月(范围3至7个月)内实现骨折愈合。3例患者需要进行动力化处理。动力化髓内钉固定患者的平均愈合时间为4.4个月(范围3至6个月),静力化髓内钉固定患者的平均愈合时间为4.8个月(范围3至7个月)。并发症并不严重。1例患者(2.2%)出现短暂性腓总神经麻痹。4例患者(8.9%)因髓内钉突出出现膝关节疼痛,取出髓内钉后疼痛消失。5例患者(11.1%)踝关节活动受限5至10度。所有患者膝关节活动均无受限。
髓内交锁钉是治疗胫骨远端骨折及骨不连的可靠方法,骨折愈合率高,并发症发生率低。