文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

前瞻性随机试验比较了胆囊疾病和胆总管结石患者两阶段与单阶段治疗的效果。

A prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage versus single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and common bile duct stones.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room No 5045, 5th Floor, Teaching Block, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2010 Aug;24(8):1986-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0891-7. Epub 2010 Feb 5.


DOI:10.1007/s00464-010-0891-7
PMID:20135172
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of patients with concomitant common bile duct stones and gallstones is still evolving. With the introduction of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration, many centers prefer single-stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration over preoperative endoscopic bile duct clearance followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The present study was done to compare these two management options. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 30 patients with symptomatic gallstones and common bile duct stones were randomized to either treatment option. Preoperative endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and/or magnetic resonance pancreaticography (MRCP) was done in all patients to confirm the diagnosis. In group I, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration was done at the same sitting; in group II, endoscopic stone clearance was followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy 4-6 weeks later. Success was defined as successful treatment by the intended modality. RESULTS: 15 patients were randomized to each group and the two groups had comparable demographic and clinical profile. In group I there was a success rate of 93.5% in comparison with 86.7% in group II (p = 0.32, Fisher's exact test). The complications were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed equivalent success rate in terms of morbidity and hospital stay. Laparoscopic approach seems to be favorable because of the smaller number of procedures and hospital visits.

摘要

背景:合并胆总管结石和胆囊结石患者的最佳治疗方案仍在不断发展。随着腹腔镜胆总管探查术的引入,许多中心倾向于在术前进行内镜胆管清除术,然后再进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术,而不是一期腹腔镜胆囊切除术和胆总管探查术。本研究旨在比较这两种治疗方案。

患者和方法:30 例有症状的胆囊结石和胆总管结石患者被随机分为两种治疗方案。所有患者均行术前超声内镜(EUS)和/或磁共振胰胆管成像(MRCP)以明确诊断。在 I 组中,腹腔镜胆囊切除术和胆总管探查术在同一时间进行;在 II 组中,内镜下取石术在 4-6 周后再进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术。成功定义为通过预期的方法成功治疗。

结果:每组有 15 例患者随机分组,两组的人口统计学和临床特征相似。在 I 组中,成功率为 93.5%,而 II 组的成功率为 86.7%(p = 0.32,Fisher 确切检验)。两组的并发症相似。

结论:结果表明,在发病率和住院时间方面,两种方法的成功率相当。腹腔镜方法因其手术次数和住院次数较少而具有优势。

相似文献

[1]
A prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage versus single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and common bile duct stones.

Surg Endosc. 2010-2-5

[2]
Comparison of one stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with intra-operative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus two-stage pre-operative endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of pre-operatively diagnosed patients with common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis.

Surg Endosc. 2017-7-21

[3]
Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials with trial sequential analysis.

Surg Endosc. 2018-3-30

[4]
Single-stage vs. two-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones: a prospective randomized trial with long-term follow-up.

J Gastrointest Surg. 2014-2-4

[5]
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and lithiasis of the common bile duct: prospective study on the importance of preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography].

Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1998-10

[6]
Mini-Invasive management of concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones : where is the evidence ( Review article).

Tunis Med. 2019

[7]
A meta-analysis of single-stage versus two-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones.

Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2015-10

[8]
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus cholecystectomy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a meta-analysis.

Surg Endosc. 2018-12-3

[9]
Gallstone disease. Management of common bile-duct stones and associated gallbladder stones: Surgical aspects.

Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006

[10]
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013-9-3

引用本文的文献

[1]
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing single-stage laparoscopic versus two-stage endoscopic management followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy of preoperatively diagnosed common bile duct stones.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2025-3-14

[2]
Treatment for recurrent choledocholithiasis: endoscopic? or laparoscopic? A prospective cohort study.

Surg Endosc. 2025-2

[3]
Structured learning and mentoring: shortening the learning curve in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Surg Endosc. 2024-12

[4]
Two institutes' experience in laparoendoscopic "rendezvous" technique for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for stones in the gallbladder and bile duct: a prospective randomized comparative clinical trial.

Updates Surg. 2024-10

[5]
Changes in the Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: 1980 to Date.

Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2024-4-28

[6]
One-step laparoscopic cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration and stone extraction versus two-step endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with stone extraction plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with common bile duct stones: a randomised feasibility and pilot clinical trial-the preGallStep trial.

Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023-2-6

[7]
Index admission vs elective laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a district general hospital experience over 6 years.

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023-1-16

[8]
Minimally invasive management of concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones: an updated network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Surg Endosc. 2023-3

[9]
EAES rapid guideline: updated systematic review, network meta-analysis, CINeMA and GRADE assessment, and evidence-informed European recommendations on the management of common bile duct stones.

Surg Endosc. 2022-11

[10]
One-stage versus two-stage approach for concomitant gallbladder and common bile duct stones: which one is more proper in patients over 80 years old?

J Minim Invasive Surg. 2022-3-15

本文引用的文献

[1]
A randomized, clinical trial to compare endoscopic sphincterotomy and subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with primary laparoscopic bile duct exploration during cholecystectomy in higher risk patients with choledocholithiasis.

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009-12

[2]
EUS versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for patients with intermediate probability of bile duct stones: a prospective randomized trial.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2009-2

[3]
Management of common bile duct stones: a ten-year experience at a tertiary care center.

JSLS. 2008

[4]
Laparoscopic ultrasound as the primary method for bile duct imaging during cholecystectomy.

Surg Endosc. 2008-1

[5]
Role of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of bile duct lithiasis.

World J Surg. 2006-9

[6]
Choledocholithiasis: evolving standards for diagnosis and management.

World J Gastroenterol. 2006-5-28

[7]
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006-4-19

[8]
Conversion rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis: does the time interval matter?

Surg Endosc. 2005-7

[9]
Long-term results after laparoscopic transverse choledochotomy for common bile duct stones.

Surg Endosc. 2005-5

[10]
Predictors of unsuccessful mechanical lithotripsy and endoscopic clearance of large bile duct stones.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2004-5

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索