Perry K A, Myers J A, Deziel D J
Department of General Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2008 Jan;22(1):208-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9558-4. Epub 2007 Aug 25.
Intraoperative fluorocholangiography (IOC) has been the standard method for bile duct imaging during cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) has been evaluated as a possible alternative, but has been used less frequently. The authors examined the evolving use of these two methods to assess the relative utility of LUS as the primary method for routine bile duct imaging during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
This study analyzed a prospective database containing 423 consecutive cholecystectomies performed by one attending surgeon in an academic medical center between 1995 and 2005.
Intraoperative bile duct imaging was performed in 371 (94%) of 396 LCs performed for cholelithiasis. As recorded, IOC was performed in 239 cases, LUS in 236 cases, and both in 104 cases. Choledocholithiasis was present in 50 patients (13%). Common bile duct stones (CBDS) were identified by LUS in 3% of the patients without preoperative indicators of CBDS, and in 10% of the patients with one or more indicators. As shown by the findings, LUS had a positive predictive value of 100%, a negative predictive value of 99.6%, a sensitivity of 92.3%, and a specificity of 100% for detecting CBDS. Also, LUS identified clinically significant bile duct anatomy in 6% of the patients. In 1995, LUS was used for 20% of cases, whereas by 2005, it was used for 97% of cases. Conversely, the use of IOC decreased from 93% to 23%.
With moderate experience, LUS can become the primary routine imaging method for evaluating the bile duct during LC. It is as reliable as IOC for detecting choledocholithiasis. In addition, LUS can locate the common bile duct during difficult dissections. On the basis of this experience, LUS is used currently in nearly all LCs and is the sole method for bile duct imaging in 75% of these cases. IOC is used as an adjunct to LUS when LUS imaging is inadequate, when stronger clinical indicators of choledocholithiasis are present, or when biliary anatomy remains uncertain.
术中荧光胆管造影(IOC)一直是胆囊切除术期间胆管成像的标准方法。腹腔镜超声(LUS)已被评估为一种可能的替代方法,但使用频率较低。作者研究了这两种方法的使用演变情况,以评估LUS作为腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)期间常规胆管成像主要方法的相对效用。
本研究分析了一个前瞻性数据库,该数据库包含1995年至2005年间一位主治外科医生在一家学术医疗中心连续进行的423例胆囊切除术。
在为胆结石进行的396例LC中,371例(94%)进行了术中胆管成像。记录显示,239例进行了IOC,236例进行了LUS,104例两者都进行了。50例患者(13%)存在胆总管结石。在无术前胆总管结石指标的患者中,LUS识别出胆总管结石(CBDS)的比例为3%,在有一个或多个指标的患者中为10%。研究结果表明,LUS检测CBDS的阳性预测值为100%,阴性预测值为99.6%,敏感性为92.3%,特异性为100%。此外,LUS在6%的患者中识别出具有临床意义的胆管解剖结构。1995年,LUS用于20%的病例,而到2005年,其用于97%的病例。相反,IOC的使用从93%降至23%。
有一定经验后,LUS可成为LC期间评估胆管的主要常规成像方法。在检测胆总管结石方面,它与IOC一样可靠。此外,LUS可在困难的解剖过程中定位胆总管。基于这一经验,目前几乎所有LC都使用LUS,在75%的此类病例中,LUS是胆管成像的唯一方法。当LUS成像不足、存在更强的胆总管结石临床指标或胆管解剖结构仍不确定时,IOC用作LUS的辅助手段。