• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单孔入路胆囊切除术:297 例多中心报告。

Single-port-access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional report of the first 297 cases.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, 219 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2010 Aug;24(8):1854-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0856-x. Epub 2010 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-009-0856-x
PMID:20135180
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An important aspect of a new surgical technique is whether it can be performed by other surgeons in other institutions. The authors report the first 297 cases in a multi-institutional and multinational review of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed via a single portal of entry.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively for the initial patients undergoing single-port cholecystectomy by 13 surgeons who performed these procedures in their institutions after training by the authors. The review included operative time, blood loss, incision length, length of hospital stay (LOS), necessary additional trocars, and other parameters important to cholecystectomy. A database of all the single-port-access (SPA) surgeries performed by the surgeons included demographic and procedural details, LOS, complications, and initial follow-up data.

RESULTS

To date, 297 single-port cholecystectomies have been performed for a variety of diagnoses, primarily cholelithiasis. The average operative time was 71 min, and the average LOS was 1-2 days. The average blood loss was minimal. The use of additional port sites outside the umbilicus occurred in 34 of the cases. Of the 35 intraoperative cholangiograms performed, 34 were successful. No significant complications occurred except for seromas and minor postoperative wound infections. These results are comparable with those for standard multiport cholecystectomy. In addition, no access site hernias (ASH) occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings demonstrate that SPA surgery is an alternative to multiport laparoscopy with fewer scars and better cosmesis. One factor affecting the rate for adoption of SPA surgery among other surgeons is the reproducibility of this new procedure. Although this study had insufficient data to determine fully the benefits of SPA surgery, the feasibility of this procedure with safe, acceptable results was demonstrated in this initial large series across multinational institutions.

摘要

背景

新手术技术的一个重要方面是它是否可以由其他外科医生在其他机构进行。作者报告了首例通过单一入口进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的多机构和多国回顾性研究的前 297 例。

方法

对 13 位外科医生在作者培训后在各自机构进行的单端口胆囊切除术的初始患者进行回顾性数据收集。该研究包括手术时间、出血量、切口长度、住院时间(LOS)、必要的附加 trocars 以及对胆囊切除术很重要的其他参数。所有外科医生进行的单端口通道(SPA)手术的数据库包括人口统计学和手术细节、LOS、并发症以及初始随访数据。

结果

迄今为止,已为各种诊断(主要是胆石症)进行了 297 例单端口胆囊切除术。平均手术时间为 71 分钟,平均 LOS 为 1-2 天。平均出血量很少。在 34 例病例中,在脐部以外使用了附加端口部位。在 35 例术中胆管造影中,有 34 例成功。除血清肿和轻微术后伤口感染外,无明显并发症。这些结果与标准多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术相当。此外,未发生切口疝(ASH)。

结论

这些发现表明 SPA 手术是多孔腹腔镜手术的替代方法,具有更少的疤痕和更好的美容效果。影响其他外科医生采用 SPA 手术的一个因素是这种新手术的可重复性。尽管这项研究的数据不足以完全确定 SPA 手术的益处,但在多机构的初始大型系列研究中证明了该手术的可行性和安全、可接受的结果。

相似文献

1
Single-port-access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional report of the first 297 cases.单孔入路胆囊切除术:297 例多中心报告。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Aug;24(8):1854-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0856-x. Epub 2010 Feb 5.
2
Single port access (SPA) cholecystectomy: two year follow-up.单孔入路(SPA)胆囊切除术:两年随访
JSLS. 2009 Oct-Dec;13(4):528-35. doi: 10.4293/108680809X12589998404245.
3
[Single-port access cholecystectomy is a safe alternative to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective comparison of single-port access versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy].[单孔通道胆囊切除术是传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的一种安全替代方法:单孔通道与标准腹腔镜胆囊切除术的回顾性比较]
Zentralbl Chir. 2013 Feb;138(1):70-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1283886. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
4
Single-port cholecystectomy versus multi-port cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study with 222 patients.单孔与多孔胆囊切除术的前瞻性队列研究:222 例患者。
World J Surg. 2013 May;37(5):991-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1946-4.
5
Single port access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a completely transumbilical approach.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一种完全经脐入路的手术方式。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009 Apr;19(2):219-22. doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0275.
6
Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) cholecystectomy.经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术
J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Feb;13(2):188-92. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0735-0. Epub 2008 Nov 22.
7
Outcomes in laparoscopic cholecystectomy by single incision with SPIDER surgical system are comparable to conventional multiport technique: one surgeon's experience.使用SPIDER手术系统单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的效果与传统多孔技术相当:一位外科医生的经验。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4793-4799. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4809-x. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
8
Single port access laparoscopic cholecystectomy (with video).单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(附视频)
World J Surg. 2009 May;33(5):1015-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9874-4.
9
Clinical experience with a multifunctional, flexible surgery system for endolumenal, single-port, and NOTES procedures.内镜、单孔和NOTES 手术用多功能灵活手术系统的临床经验。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Feb;25(2):586-92. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1225-5. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
10
Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a preliminary study in 37 patients with gallbladder disease.单孔经脐腹腔镜胆囊切除术:37例胆囊疾病患者的初步研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009 Aug;19(4):495-9. doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0424.

引用本文的文献

1
ArtiSential laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus singlefulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Which minimally invasive surgery is better?ArtiSential腹腔镜胆囊切除术与单支点腹腔镜胆囊切除术:哪种微创手术更好?
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2025 Feb 28;29(1):48-54. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.24-137. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
2
Carbon footprints in minimally invasive surgery: Good patient outcomes, but costly for the environment.微创手术中的碳足迹:对患者疗效良好,但对环境成本高昂。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jul 27;15(7):1277-1285. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i7.1277.
3
Safety and effectiveness of reduced-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in Asian morbidly obese patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Single Port Access (SPA™) Minimal Access Surgery Through a Single Incision.单孔入路(SPA™):经单一切口的微创外科手术。
Surg Technol Int. 2009 Apr;18:19-25.
2
Single port access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a completely transumbilical approach.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一种完全经脐入路的手术方式。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009 Apr;19(2):219-22. doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0275.
3
The feasibility of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a pilot study of 20 cases.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的可行性:20 例初步研究。
减少端口腹腔镜袖状胃切除术在亚洲病态肥胖患者中的安全性和有效性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 6;11(1):23511. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02999-1.
4
Trans-stomal single-port laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal is an efficacious and efficient procedure: a case-controlled study.经肛单孔腹腔镜Hartmann 术式逆行还纳术是一种有效且高效的手术方式:一项病例对照研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2020 May;24(5):455-462. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02166-0. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
5
Reduced-Port Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbidly Obese Japanese Patients: a Retrospective Case-Matched Study.经脐单部位腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗病态肥胖症的临床研究 摘要:目的探讨经脐单部位腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(SILS-SG)治疗病态肥胖症的安全性和有效性。方法选取 2019 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月于我院接受 SILS-SG 的 52 例病态肥胖症患者为观察组,另选取同期接受传统腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)的 52 例病态肥胖症患者为对照组。比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、术后并发症发生率、术后 1 年的减重效果。结果观察组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间均明显短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者术后均未发生严重并发症,观察组的术后并发症发生率为 3.85%,明显低于对照组的 13.46%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后 1 年,两组患者的 BMI、腰围、体质量均明显下降,且观察组的下降幅度明显大于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 SILS-SG 治疗病态肥胖症安全有效,具有创伤小、恢复快、并发症少等优点,值得临床推广应用。
Obes Surg. 2019 Oct;29(10):3291-3298. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03987-1.
6
Clinical outcomes of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy versus conventional 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单孔机器人胆囊切除术与传统三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床效果比较。
Can J Surg. 2019 Feb 1;62(1):52-56. doi: 10.1503/cjs.000118.
7
Feasibility and safety of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients: A single institution, retrospective case series.老年患者单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的可行性与安全性:一项单中心回顾性病例系列研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Sep 6;22:30-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.08.024. eCollection 2017 Oct.
8
Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with conventional instruments and ports: Initial experience at tertiary care public sector Hospital.使用传统器械和端口的单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术:三级医疗公共部门医院的初步经验。
Pak J Med Sci. 2017 May-Jun;33(3):654-658. doi: 10.12669/pjms.333.12930.
9
Safety and feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in obese patients.肥胖患者单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性与可行性
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016 Dec 24;13:34-37. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.12.048. eCollection 2017 Jan.
10
A Comparative Study of Outcomes Between Single-Site Robotic and Multi-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Experience from a Tertiary Care Center.单孔机器人与多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术疗效的比较研究:来自三级医疗中心的经验
World J Surg. 2017 May;41(5):1246-1253. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3799-0.
HPB (Oxford). 2008;10(5):336-40. doi: 10.1080/13651820802276622.
4
Transumbilical Gelport access technique for performing single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS).经脐凝胶端口入路技术用于实施单孔腹腔镜手术(SILS)。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Jan;13(1):159-62. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0737-y. Epub 2008 Oct 30.
5
Operative strategy can reduce the incidence of major bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.手术策略可降低腹腔镜胆囊切除术中主要胆管损伤的发生率。
Am Surg. 2008 Oct;74(10):985-7.
6
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:无痕手术。
Surg Endosc. 2009 Apr;23(4):896-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0147-y. Epub 2008 Sep 25.
7
Transumbilical flexible endoscopic cholecystectomy in humans: first feasibility study using a hybrid technique.经脐部柔性内镜胆囊切除术在人体中的应用:采用混合技术的首次可行性研究。
Endoscopy. 2008 May;40(5):428-31. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995742.
8
A meta-analysis of ambulatory versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy.门诊与住院腹腔镜胆囊切除术的荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2008 Sep;22(9):1928-34. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9867-2. Epub 2008 Apr 9.
9
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy.日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术安全性和有效性的随机对照试验的Meta分析。
Br J Surg. 2008 Feb;95(2):161-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6105.
10
New developments in surgery: Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES).外科新进展:经自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)。
Arch Surg. 2007 Mar;142(3):295-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.3.295.