• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

合作博弈和非合作博弈在大规模水量水质管理中的应用:案例研究。

Application of cooperative and non-cooperative games in large-scale water quantity and quality management: a case study.

机构信息

Department of Environmental Engineering, Graduate Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Environ Monit Assess. 2011 Jan;172(1-4):157-69. doi: 10.1007/s10661-010-1324-8. Epub 2010 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1007/s10661-010-1324-8
PMID:20135217
Abstract

In this paper, two cooperative and non-cooperative methodologies are developed for a large-scale water allocation problem in Southern Iran. The water shares of the water users and their net benefits are determined using optimization models having economic objectives with respect to the physical and environmental constraints of the system. The results of the two methodologies are compared based on the total obtained economic benefit, and the role of cooperation in utilizing a shared water resource is demonstrated. In both cases, the water quality in rivers satisfies the standards. Comparing the results of the two mentioned approaches shows the importance of acting cooperatively to achieve maximum revenue in utilizing a surface water resource while the river water quantity and quality issues are addressed.

摘要

本文为伊朗南部的一个大规模水资源分配问题开发了两种合作和非合作的方法。利用具有经济目标的优化模型,根据系统的物理和环境约束条件,确定了用水户的水份额及其净效益。根据总经济效益比较了两种方法的结果,并展示了合作在利用共享水资源方面的作用。在这两种情况下,河流的水质都符合标准。比较这两种方法的结果表明,在解决河流水量和水质问题的同时,合作对于利用地表水获得最大收益非常重要。

相似文献

1
Application of cooperative and non-cooperative games in large-scale water quantity and quality management: a case study.合作博弈和非合作博弈在大规模水量水质管理中的应用:案例研究。
Environ Monit Assess. 2011 Jan;172(1-4):157-69. doi: 10.1007/s10661-010-1324-8. Epub 2010 Feb 5.
2
A game theoretic approach for interbasin water resources allocation considering the water quality issues.一种考虑水质问题的跨流域水资源分配博弈论方法。
Environ Monit Assess. 2010 Aug;167(1-4):527-44. doi: 10.1007/s10661-009-1070-y. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
3
Development of an electronic seepage chamber for extended use in a river.一种用于河流中长期使用的电子渗流室的研制。
Ground Water. 2009 Jan-Feb;47(1):136-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2008.00491.x. Epub 2008 Sep 12.
4
Indicator-based approach for assessing the vulnerability of freshwater resources in the Bagmati River basin, Nepal.基于指标的方法评估尼泊尔巴格马蒂河流域淡水资源脆弱性。
Environ Manage. 2011 Nov;48(5):1044-59. doi: 10.1007/s00267-011-9744-y. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
5
Evaluation of surface water quality characteristics by using multivariate statistical techniques: a case study of the Euphrates river basin, Turkey.运用多元统计技术评估地表水水质特征:以土耳其幼发拉底河流域为例
Environ Monit Assess. 2009 Apr;151(1-4):259-64. doi: 10.1007/s10661-008-0267-9. Epub 2008 May 20.
6
A parsimonious dynamic model for river water quality assessment.一种用于河流水质评估的简约动态模型。
Water Sci Technol. 2010;61(3):607-18. doi: 10.2166/wst.2010.865.
7
Optimal water quality monitoring network design for river systems.河流系统的最佳水质监测网络设计
J Environ Manage. 2009 Jul;90(10):2987-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.04.011. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
8
Evaluation of cooperative and non-cooperative game theoretic approaches for water allocation of transboundary rivers.评价跨界河流水资源分配的合作与非合作博弈理论方法。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 7;12(1):3991. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07971-1.
9
Evaluation of ground water monitoring network by principal component analysis.利用主成分分析法评估地下水监测网络
Ground Water. 2001 Mar-Apr;39(2):181-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2001.tb02299.x.
10
A Decision Support System approach for rivers monitoring and sustainable management.一种用于河流监测与可持续管理的决策支持系统方法。
Environ Monit Assess. 2004 Aug-Sep;96(1-3):85-98. doi: 10.1023/b:emas.0000031717.13972.27.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of long-term strategies of riparian countries in transboundary river basins.分析跨界河流流域的河岸国家的长期战略。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 12;11(1):20199. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99655-5.
2
A fuzzy multi-stakeholder socio-optimal model for water and waste load allocation.一个用于水和废物流分配的模糊多利益相关者社会最优模型。
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 May 10;191(6):359. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7504-2.
3
Two Monthly Continuous Dynamic Model Based on Nash Bargaining Theory for Conflict Resolution in Reservoir System.基于纳什议价理论的水库系统冲突解决双月连续动态模型

本文引用的文献

1
A game theoretic approach for trading discharge permits in rivers.一种用于河流排放许可证交易的博弈论方法。
Water Sci Technol. 2009;60(3):793-804. doi: 10.2166/wst.2009.394.
2
A game theoretic approach for interbasin water resources allocation considering the water quality issues.一种考虑水质问题的跨流域水资源分配博弈论方法。
Environ Monit Assess. 2010 Aug;167(1-4):527-44. doi: 10.1007/s10661-009-1070-y. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
3
A conflict-resolution model for the conjunctive use of surface and groundwater resources that considers water-quality issues: a case study.
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 7;10(12):e0143198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143198. eCollection 2015.
4
River water quality management under incomplete information: application of an N-person iterated signaling game.不完全信息下的河流水质管理:N 人迭代信号博弈的应用。
Environ Monit Assess. 2012 Oct;184(10):5875-88. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-2387-x. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
一种考虑水质问题的地表水与地下水资源联合利用冲突解决模型:案例研究
Environ Manage. 2009 Mar;43(3):470-82. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9191-6. Epub 2008 Sep 5.
4
A stochastic conflict resolution model for trading pollutant discharge permits in river systems.河流系统中污染物排放许可证交易的随机冲突解决模型。
Environ Monit Assess. 2009 Jul;154(1-4):219-32. doi: 10.1007/s10661-008-0390-7. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
5
A simplified model for reservoir operation considering the water quality issues: application of the Young conflict resolution theory.一种考虑水质问题的水库调度简化模型:杨氏冲突解决理论的应用
Environ Monit Assess. 2008 Nov;146(1-3):77-89. doi: 10.1007/s10661-007-0061-0. Epub 2008 Jan 19.
6
Developing a master plan for hospital solid waste management: a case study.制定医院固体废物管理总体规划:一项案例研究
Waste Manag. 2007;27(5):626-38. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.03.018. Epub 2006 Jun 27.